SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005
Commission File Number 1-8504
UNIFIRST CORPORATION
(Exact name of
registrant as specified in its charter)
Massachusetts |
04-2103460 |
(State of Incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification Number) |
68 Jonspin Road
Wilmington,
Massachusetts 01887
(Address of principal
executive offices)(Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number: (978) 658-8888
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Class |
Name of each exchange on which shares are traded |
---|---|
Common Stock, | New York Stock Exchange |
$.10 par value per share |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x Noo
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes x Noo
The number of outstanding shares of UniFirst Corporation Common Stock and Class B Common Stock at November 1, 2005 were 9,618,363 and 9,620,860, respectively. The aggregate market value of shares held by non-affiliates of the Company as of the end of the last business day of UniFirsts most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $354,862,665 (based upon the closing price of the Companys Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on said date and assuming the market value of a share of Class B Common Stock (which is generally non-transferable, but is convertible at any time into one share of Common Stock) is identical to the market value of the Common Stock).
Table of Contents |
|
---|---|
PART I | |
Documents Incorporated by Reference | |
Item 1. Business | |
Item 2. Properties | |
Item 3. Legal Proceedings | |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | |
PART II | |
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | |
Item 6. Selected Financial Data | |
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | |
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | |
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | |
Consolidated statements of income for each of the three years in the period ended August 27, 2005 | |
Consolidated balance sheets as of August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004 | |
Consolidated statements of shareholders' equity for each of the three years in the period ended August 27, 2005 | |
Consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 27, 2005 | |
Notes to consolidated financial statements | |
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | |
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures | |
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting | |
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
Item 9B. Other Information | |
PART III | |
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant | |
Item 11. Executive Compensation | |
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management | |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions | |
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services | |
PART IV | |
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K | |
Ex-18.1 Preferability Letter from Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
Ex-23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
Ex-31.1 Section 302 Certification of CEO | |
Ex-31.2 Section 302 Certification of CFO | |
Ex-32.1 Section 906 Certification of CEO | |
Ex-32.2 Section 906 Certification of CFO |
Portions of the Companys Proxy Statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the close of the 2005 fiscal year) are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof. This Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that might cause such a difference are discussed in the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
UniFirst Corporation (the Company or UniFirst) is one of the largest providers of workplace uniforms and protective clothing in the United States. The Company designs, manufactures, rents, cleans, delivers, and sells a wide range of uniforms and protective clothing, including shirts, pants, jackets, coveralls, jumpsuits, lab coats, smocks and aprons, and also rents industrial wiping products, floor mats, facility service products, other non-garment items, and provides first aid cabinet services and other safety supplies, to a variety of manufacturers, retailers and service companies. The Company serves businesses of all sizes in numerous industry categories. At certain specialized facilities, the Company also decontaminates and cleans work clothes that may have been exposed to radioactive materials and services special cleanroom protective wear.
The Company has six operating segments: US Rental and Cleaning, Canadian Rental and Cleaning, Manufacturing (MFG), Specialty Garments Rental and Cleaning (Specialty Garments), First Aid and Corporate. The US Rental and Cleaning and Canadian Rental and Cleaning operating segments have been combined to form the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment. The US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment purchases, rents, cleans, delivers and sells, uniforms and protective clothing and non-garment items in the United States and Canada. The Corporate operating segment consists of costs associated with the Companys distribution center, sales and marketing, information systems, engineering, materials management, manufacturing planning, finance, budgeting, human resources, other general and administrative costs and interest expense. The revenues generated from the Corporate operating segment represent certain direct sales made by the Company directly from its distribution center. The products sold by this operating segment are the same products rented and sold by the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segments.The MFG operating segment designs and manufactures uniforms and non-garment items solely for the purpose of providing these goods to the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment. The Specialty Garments operating segment purchases, rents, cleans, delivers and sells, specialty garments and non-garment items primarily for nuclear and clean room applications. The First Aid operating segment sells first aid cabinet services and other safety supplies.
In fiscal 2005, the Company generated $763.8 million in revenue, of which approximately 88% was derived from the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning and Corporate segments. Specialty Garments and First Aid accounted for 8% and 4% of 2005 revenues, respectively.
We maintain our website at www.unifirst.com, and make available free of charge through our website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, including exhibits, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after such documents are electronically filed, or furnished, to the SEC.
The Company provides its customers with personalized workplace uniforms and protective work clothing in a broad range of styles, colors, sizes and fabrics. The Companys uniform products include shirts, pants, jackets, coveralls, jumpsuits, smocks, aprons and specialized protective wear, such as flame resistant and high visibility garments. At certain specialized facilities, the Company also decontaminates and cleans clothes which may have been exposed to radioactive materials and services special cleanroom protective wear. The Company also offers non-garment items and services, such as industrial wiping products, floor mats, dry and wet mops, and other textile products.
The Company offers its customers a range of garment service options, including full-service rental programs in which garments are cleaned and serviced by the Company, lease programs in which garments are cleaned and maintained by individual employees, and purchase programs to buy garments and related items directly. As part of its rental business, the Company picks up a customers soiled uniforms and/or other items on a periodic basis (usually weekly) and delivers back cleaned and processed replacement items. We believe the Companys centralized services, specialized equipment, and economies of scale generally allow it to be more cost effective in providing garment and related services than customers would be by themselves, particularly those customers with high employee turnover rates. The Companys uniform program is intended not only to help its customers foster greater company identity, but to enhance their corporate image and improve employee safety, productivity and morale. The Company primarily serves its customers pursuant to written service contracts with a duration of five years.
The Company serves businesses of all sizes in numerous industry categories. Typical customers include automobile service centers and dealers, delivery services, food and general merchandise retailers, food processors and service operations, light manufacturers, maintenance facilities, restaurants, service companies, soft and durable goods wholesalers, transportation companies, and others who require employee clothing for image, identification, protection or utility purposes. With respect to the Companys Specialty Garment segment, typical customers include government agencies, research and development laboratories, high technology companies and utilities operating nuclear reactors. The Company currently services approximately 190,000 customer locations in the United States, Canada and Europe from 179 manufacturing, distribution and customer service facilities.
The Company employs trained sales representatives whose sole function is to market the Companys services to potential customers and develop new accounts. The Company also utilizes its route salespeople to maximize sales to existing customers, such as by offering garment rental customers the opportunity to purchase non-garment items. Sales representatives utilize an extensive, proprietary database of pre-screened and qualified business prospects. This database is built through responses to the Companys promotional initiatives, through contacts via its World Wide Web site and trade shows and through the selective use of purchased lists. The Company also endeavors to elevate its brand identity through advertising and promotional initiatives.
The Company believes that customer service is the most important element in developing and maintaining its market position and that its emphasis on customer service is reflected throughout its business. The Company serves its customers through approximately 1,400 route salespersons, who generally interact on a weekly basis with their accounts, and more than 850 service support people, who are charged with expeditiously handling customer requirements regarding the outfitting of new customer employees, garment repair and replacement, billing inquiries and other matters. The Companys policy is to respond to all customer inquiries and problems within 24 hours.
The Companys customer service function is supported by its fully-networked management information systems, which provide Company personnel with access to information on the status of customers orders, inventory availability and shipping information, as well as information regarding customers individual employees, including names, sizes, uniform styles and colors. The Company has a national account sales group that targets larger customers with nationwide operations for which the Company can serve as the primary supplier of garment services. The Company currently employs twenty persons in its national account sales organization.
The uniform rental and sales industry is highly competitive. The principal methods of competition in the industry are quality of service and price. The Company believes that the top four companies in the uniform rental segment of the industry, including UniFirst, currently generate over half of the industrys volume. The Companys leading competitors include Aramark Corporation, Cintas Corporation and G&K Services, Inc. The remainder of the market, however, is divided among more than 600 smaller businesses, many of which serve one or a limited number of markets or geographic service areas and a small group of which have revenues of up to approximately $200 million. In addition to its traditional rental competitors, the Company may increasingly compete in the future with businesses that focus on selling uniforms and other related items. The Company also competes with industry competitors for acquisitions, which has the effect of increasing the price for acquisitions and reducing the number of acquisition candidates available to it. The Company believes that its ability to compete effectively is enhanced by the superior customer service and support that it provides its customers.
The Company manufactured approximately 55% of all garments which it placed in service during fiscal 2005. These were primarily work pants manufactured at its plant in Ebano, San Luis Potosi, Mexico and shirts manufactured at its plant in Valles, San Luis Potosi, Mexico. The balance of the garments used in its programs are purchased from a variety of industry suppliers. While the Company currently acquires the raw materials with which it produces its garments from a limited number of suppliers, the Company believes that such materials are readily available from other sources. To date, the Company has experienced no significant difficulty in obtaining any of its raw materials or supplies.
At August 27, 2005, the Company employed approximately 9,200 persons. Approximately 2% of United States employees are represented by a union, which is pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. The Company considers its employee relations to be good.
The executive officers of the Company are as follows:
NAME |
AGE |
POSITION |
---|---|---|
Ronald D. Croatti | 62 | Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer |
Cynthia Croatti | 50 | Executive Vice President and Treasurer |
John B. Bartlett | 64 | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Dennis G. Assad | 60 | Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing |
Bruce P. Boynton | 57 | Senior Vice President, Operations |
David A. DiFillippo | 48 | Senior Vice President, Operations |
The principal occupation and positions for the past five years of the executive officers named above are as follows:
Ronald D. Croatti joined the Company in 1965. Mr. Croatti became Chairman of the Board in fiscal 2002. He has served as Chief Executive Officer since 1991. Mr. Croatti has overall responsibility for the management of the Company.
Cynthia Croatti joined the Company in 1980. Ms. Croatti has served as Executive Vice President since January 2001, and as Treasurer since 1982 and has primary responsibility for overseeing the human resources and purchasing functions of the Company.
John B. Bartlett joined the Company in 1977. Mr. Bartlett has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 1986 and has primary responsibility for overseeing the financial functions of the Company, as well as its information systems department.
Dennis G. Assad joined the Company in 1975. Mr. Assad has served as Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing since 1995 and has primary responsibility for overseeing the sales and marketing functions of the Company.
Bruce P. Boynton joined the Company in 1976. Mr. Boynton has served as Senior Vice President, Operations since January 2001, is the chief operating officer for the Companys Canadian operations and has primary responsibility for overseeing the operations of certain regions in the United States. Prior to January 2001, Mr. Boynton had served as Vice President, Operations since 1986.
David A. DiFillippo joined the Company in 1979. Mr. DiFillippo has served as Senior Vice President, Operations since January 2002, and has primary responsibility for overseeing the operations of certain regions in the United States. Prior to January 2002, Mr. DiFillippo had served as Vice President, Central Rental Group since January 2000. Prior to January 2000, Mr. DiFillippo had served as a Regional General Manager.
Ronald D. Croatti and Cynthia Croatti are siblings. David A. DiFillippos father is on the Board of Directors.
The Company and its operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous wastes and other substances. In particular, industrial laundries use and must dispose of detergent waste water and other residues. The Company is attentive to the environmental concerns surrounding the disposal of these materials and has through the years taken measures to avoid their improper disposal. In the past, the Company has settled, or contributed to the settlement of, actions or claims brought against the Company relating to the disposal of hazardous materials and there can be no assurance that the Company will not have to expend material amounts of money to remediate the consequences of any such disposal in the future. Further, under environmental laws, an owner or lessee of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances located on or in or emanating from such property, as well as related costs of investigation and property damage. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or lessee knew of or was responsible for the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. There can be no assurances that acquired or leased locations have been operated in compliance with environmental laws and regulations or that future uses or conditions will not result in the imposition of liability upon the Company under such laws or expose the Company to third-party actions such as tort suits. The Company continues to address environmental conditions under terms of consent orders negotiated with the applicable environmental authorities or otherwise with respect to sites located in or related to Woburn, Massachusetts, Uvalde, Texas, Williamstown, Vermont, and Springfield, Massachusetts. In addition, the Company is assessing the extent of environmental contamination and potential exposure at sites it acquired in connection with its acquisition of Textilease Corporation in September 2003, and it is defending against claims concerning alleged environmental conditions with respect to a site once owned by a former subsidiary in Somerville, Massachusetts. For additional discussion refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The Companys nuclear garment decontamination facilities are licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, or in certain cases by the applicable state agency, and are subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities. In certain cases, regulation of nuclear facilities or related services have resulted in the suspension of operations at certain nuclear facilities served by the Company or disruptions of the Companys ability to service such facilities. There can be no assurance that such increased scrutiny will not lead to the shut-down of such facilities or otherwise cause material disruptions in the Companys garment decontamination business.
We make available free of charge our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. These reports are available on our website at http://www.unifirst.com. In addition, you may request a copy of these filings, excluding exhibits, by contacting our Investor Relations group at (978) 658-8888 or at UniFirst Corporation, 68 Jonspin Road, Wilmington, MA 01887. Information included on our website is not deemed to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
At August 27, 2005, the Company owned or occupied 179 facilities containing an aggregate of approximately 4.9 million square feet located in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Germany and the Netherlands. The Company owns 106 of these facilities, containing about 4.3 million square feet. These facilities include the Companys 320,000 square foot Owensboro, Kentucky distribution center and its many customer service locations. The Company believes its industrial laundry facilities are among the most modern in the industry.
The Company owns substantially all of the machinery and equipment used in its operations. In the opinion of the Company, its facilities and its production, cleaning and decontamination equipment have been well maintained and are adequate for the Companys present needs. The Company also owns a fleet of approximately 2,500 delivery vans, trucks and other vehicles.
From time to time the Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of its business operations, including personal injury, customer contract, employment claims and environmental matters as described above. The Company maintains insurance coverage providing indemnification against the majority of such claims and management does not expect that any material loss to the Company will be sustained as a result thereof.
None
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our Common Stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol UNF, while the Class B Common Stock is not publicly traded. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of our Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange, and the dividends per share of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. These Common Stock sales prices represent prices between dealers and do not include retail mark-ups, markdowns, or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
Price Per Share | Dividends Per Share | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year ended August 27, 2005 |
High |
Low |
Common Stock |
Class B Common Stock | ||||||||||
First Quarter | $ | 29.89 | $ | 25.50 | $ | 0.0375 | $ | 0.0300 | ||||||
Second Quarter | 40.86 | 27.00 | 0.0375 | 0.0300 | ||||||||||
Third Quarter | 41.38 | 35.20 | 0.0375 | 0.0300 | ||||||||||
Fourth Quarter | 45.75 | 36.05 | 0.0375 | 0.0300 |
Price Per Share | Dividends Per Share | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year ended August 28, 2004 |
High |
Low |
Common Stock |
Class B Common Stock | ||||||||||
First Quarter | $ | 28.27 | $ | 19.93 | $ | 0.0375 | $ | 0.0300 | ||||||
Second Quarter | 28.00 | 21.25 | 0.0375 | 0.0300 | ||||||||||
Third Quarter | 29.99 | 24.26 | 0.0375 | 0.0300 | ||||||||||
Fourth Quarter | 29.93 | 26.00 | 0.0375 | 0.0300 |
The approximate number of shareholders of record of the Companys Common Stock and Class B Common Stock as of November 1, 2005 were 98 and 18, respectively.
We have generally declared and paid cash dividends of the Companys Common Stock and Class B Common Stock quarterly. The amounts of future dividends on our Common Stock or Class B Common Stock will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors after taking into account various factors, including our financial condition, operating results, anticipated cash needs, and plans for expansion. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to 125% of any cash dividend paid on each share of Class B Common Stock.
The following table sets forth information concerning the Companys equity compensation plans as of August 27, 2005.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
| |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plan category |
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plan (excluding securities referenced in column (a)) | ||||||||
(a) | |||||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 239,875 | $ | 21.83 | 132,500 |
The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.
The selected consolidated balance sheet data set forth below as of August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004 and the selected consolidated income statement data for the three years in the period ended August 27, 2005 are derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of UniFirst Corporation included in this annual report on Form 10-K. All other selected consolidated financial data set forth below, except for per share data for the year ended August 25, 2001, is derived from audited financial statements of UniFirst Corporation not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The per share data listed below is accounted for in accordance with the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FAS 128. EITF Issue No. 03-6 provides guidance in determining when the two-class method, as defined in Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 128, Earnings per Share, should be utilized in calculating earnings per share. The Company was required to adopt EITF Issue No. 03-6 in the quarter ended August 28, 2004 and to apply the provisions of EITF Issue No. 03-6 retroactively to all periods presented. The Common Stock of the Company has a 25% dividend preference to the Class B Common Stock. The Class B Common Stock, which has ten votes per share as opposed to one vote per share for the Common Stock, is not freely transferable but may be converted at any time on a one-for-one basis into Common Stock at the option of the holder of the Class B Common Stock. EITF Issue No. 03-6 requires the income per share for each class of common stock to be calculated assuming 100% of the Companys earnings are distributed as dividends to each class of common stock based on their respective dividend rights.
Fiscal Year Ended August (In thousands, except per share data) |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Balance Sheet Data | |||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 748,305 | $ | 702,366 | $ | 516,131 | $ | 496,379 | $ | 493,357 | |||||||
Long-term obligations | $ | 176,671 | $ | 178,841 | $ | 69,812 | $ | 85,096 | $ | 94,795 | |||||||
Shareholders' equity | $ | 412,342 | $ | 368,707 | $ | 336,338 | $ | 310,698 | $ | 286,503 | |||||||
Selected Income Statement Data | |||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 763,842 | $ | 719,356 | $ | 596,936 | $ | 578,898 | $ | 556,371 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | $ | 43,927 | $ | 44,889 | $ | 39,659 | $ | 38,031 | $ | 37,568 | |||||||
Income from operations | $ | 76,012 | $ | 64,004 | $ | 48,838 | $ | 51,979 | $ | 47,565 | |||||||
Other expense, net | $ | 6,841 | $ | 9,406 | $ | 1,266 | $ | 8,660 | $ | 10,108 | |||||||
Provision for income taxes | $ | 25,823 | $ | 21,020 | $ | 18,310 | $ | 16,460 | $ | 14,233 | |||||||
Income before cumulative effect of | |||||||||||||||||
accounting change | $ | 43,348 | $ | 33,578 | $ | 29,262 | $ | 26,859 | $ | 23,224 | |||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | -- | -- | 2,242 | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 43,348 | $ | 33,578 | $ | 27,020 | $ | 26,859 | $ | 23,224 | |||||||
Income per share before cumulative effect of | |||||||||||||||||
accounting change: | |||||||||||||||||
Basic - Common stock | $ | 2.51 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 1.71 | $ | 1.56 | $ | 1.34 | |||||||
Basic - Class B Common Stock | $ | 2.01 | $ | 1.56 | $ | 1.37 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 1.07 | |||||||
Diluted - Common stock | $ | 2.24 | $ | 1.74 | $ | 1.52 | $ | 1.39 | $ | 1.20 | |||||||
Income per share after cumulative effect of | |||||||||||||||||
accounting change: | |||||||||||||||||
Basic - Common stock | $ | 2.51 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 1.58 | $ | 1.56 | $ | 1.34 | |||||||
Basic - Class B Common Stock | $ | 2.01 | $ | 1.56 | $ | 1.27 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 1.07 | |||||||
Diluted - Common stock | $ | 2.24 | $ | 1.74 | $ | 1.40 | $ | 1.39 | $ | 1.20 | |||||||
Dividends per share | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | |||||||
Class B Common Stock | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | |||||||
Refer to Note 2 of these consolidated financial statements for discussion of the Companys acquisition of Textilease Corporation on September 2, 2003.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company changed its accounting policy for a portion of its inventories from last-in, first-out (LIFO), to the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method of accounting. Consistent with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, the Company retroactively restated its prior financial statements. As a result, inventories, accrued income taxes, and retained earnings, as presented, have been adjusted by approximately $1.5 million, $0.6 million, and $0.9 million, for each of the fiscal years ended August 2004, 2003, 2002, and 2001. This change had no impact on the consolidated statements of income for any period presented. Refer to Note 1(i) of these consolidated financial statements for further discussion on this change in accounting policy.
Overview
UniFirst is one of the largest providers of workplace uniforms and protective clothing in the United States. The Company designs, manufactures, personalizes, rents, cleans, delivers, and sells a wide range of uniforms and protective clothing, including shirts, pants, jackets, coveralls, jumpsuits, lab coats, smocks and aprons, and also rents industrial wiping products, floor mats and other non-garment items, to a variety of manufacturers, retailers and service companies. The Company serves businesses of all sizes in numerous industry categories. Typical customers include automobile service centers and dealers, delivery services, food and general merchandise retailers, food processors and service operations, light manufacturers, maintenance facilities, restaurants, service companies, soft and durable goods wholesalers, transportation companies, and others who require employee clothing for image, identification, protection or utility purposes. At certain specialized facilities, the Company also decontaminates and cleans work clothes that may have been exposed to radioactive materials and services special cleanroom protective wear. Typical customers for these specialized services include government agencies, research and development laboratories, high technology companies and utilities operating nuclear reactors.
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information of those segments to be presented in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Companys chief operating decision maker, as defined under SFAS No. 131, is the Companys chief executive officer. The Company has six operating segments based on the information reviewed by its chief executive officer: US Rental and Cleaning, Canadian Rental and Cleaning, Manufacturing (MFG), Specialty Garments Rental and Cleaning (Specialty Garments), First Aid and Corporate. The US Rental and Cleaning and Canadian Rental and Cleaning operating segments have been combined to form the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment. Refer to Note 13 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the Companys disclosure of segment information.
The US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment purchases, rents, cleans, delivers and sells, uniforms and protective clothing and non-garment items in the United States and Canada. The operations of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment are referred to by the Company as its industrial laundry operations and the locations related to this reporting segment are referred to as industrial laundries.
The MFG operating segment designs and manufactures uniforms and non-garment items solely for the purpose of providing these goods to the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment. The amounts reflected as revenues of MFG are generated when goods are shipped from the Companys manufacturing facilities to other Company locations. These revenues are recorded at a transfer price which is typically in excess of the actual manufacturing cost. The transfer price is determined by management and may not necessarily represent the fair value of the products manufactured. Products are carried in inventory and subsequently placed in service and amortized at this transfer price. On a consolidated basis, intercompany MFG revenues and MFG income are eliminated and the carrying value of inventories and rental merchandise in service is reduced to the manufacturing cost. Income before income taxes from MFG net of the intercompany MFG elimination was $21.6 million, $15.0 million, and $10.4 million for years ended August 27, 2005, August 28, 2004 and August 30, 2003, respectively. This income offsets the merchandise amortization costs incurred by the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment as the merchandise costs of this reporting segment are amortized and recognized based on inventories purchased from MFG at the transfer price which is above the Companys manufacturing cost.
The Corporate operating segment consists of costs associated with the Companys distribution center, sales and marketing, information systems, engineering, materials management, manufacturing planning, finance, budgeting, human resources, other general and administrative costs and interest expense. The revenues generated from the Corporate operating segment represent certain direct sales made by the Company directly from its distribution center. The products sold by this operating segment are the same products rented and sold by the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment. In the segment disclosures in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, no assets or capital expenditures are presented for the Corporate operating segment as no assets are allocated to this operating segment in the information reviewed by the chief executive officer. However, depreciation and amortization expense related to certain assets are reflected in income from operations and income before income taxes for the Corporate operating segment. The assets that give rise to this depreciation and amortization are included in the total assets of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment as this is how they are tracked and reviewed by the Company.
The Specialty Garments operating segment purchases, rents, cleans, delivers and sells, specialty garments and non-garment items primarily for nuclear and clean room applications. The First Aid operating segment sells first aid cabinet services and other safety supplies. In fiscal 2003 and prior, no assets or capital expenditures are presented for the First Aid operating segment as no assets were allocated to this operating segment in the information reviewed by the chief executive officer as they were not material. However, depreciation and amortization expense related to certain assets are reflected in income from operations and income before income taxes for the First Aid operating segment. The assets that give rise to this depreciation and amortization in fiscal 2003 and prior are included in the total assets of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment as this is how they were tracked and reviewed by the Company. After the Textilease acquisition in fiscal 2004, the Company began allocating assets to this operating segment as the total assets related to First Aid increased.
Approximately 88% of the Companys revenues in 2005 were derived from US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning, and Corporate. A key driver of this business is the number of workers employed by the customers of the Company. Our revenues are directly impacted by fluctuations in these employment levels. Revenues from Specialty Garments, which accounted for 8% of our 2005 revenues, increase during outages and refueling by nuclear power plants, as garment usage increases at these times. First Aid represented 4% of total revenue in 2005.
The Company believes the following critical accounting policies reflect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. There have been no changes in judgments or estimates that had a material effect on our consolidated financial statements for the periods presented.
Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency of UniFirsts foreign operations is the local countrys currency. Transaction gains and losses, including gains and losses on intercompany transactions, are included in selling and administrative expenses, in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Assets and liabilities of operations outside the United States are translated into U.S. dollars using period-end exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates in effect during each month during the fiscal year. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included in shareholders equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company recognizes revenue from rental operations in the period in which the services are provided. Direct sale revenue is recognized in the period in which the product is shipped. Management judgments and estimates are used in determining the collectability of accounts receivable and evaluating the adequacy of allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company considers specific accounts receivable and historical bad debt experience, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and the age of outstanding balances as part of its evaluation. Changes in estimates are reflected in the period they become known. If the financial condition of the Companys customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Material changes in managements estimates may result in significant differences in the amount and timing of bad debt expense recognition for any given period.
Inventories and Rental Merchandise in Service
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value, net of any reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the likelihood that new goods on hand can be sold to customers or used in rental operations. Historical inventory usage and current revenue trends are considered in estimating both excess and obsolete inventories. If actual product demand and market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required. The Company uses the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method to value its inventories. Inventories primarily consist of finished goods.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company changed its accounting policy for a portion of its inventories from last-in, first-out (LIFO), to the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method of accounting. This change had no impact on the consolidated statements of income for any period presented. The Company believes that the FIFO method is preferable to LIFO because (i) all of the Companys primary competitors currently use the FIFO inventory method, therefore, the change will make the comparison of results among these companies more consistent (ii) the change is consistent with the increased emphasis on consistency between Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP) in the United States and International Accounting Standards (IAS) which provide that the FIFO or weighted average methods are acceptable and does not provide for the use the LIFO method (iii) this change will result in all of the Companys inventories being valued consistently using the FIFO method of accounting and (iv) due to the current low inflation levels, the Companys inventory costs have remained fairly constant and are not expected to increase in the near future. Consistent with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, the Company has retroactively restated its prior financial statements. The impact of this change increased inventories, accrued income taxes, and retained earnings approximately $1.5 million, $0.6 million, and $0.9 million, respectively, on the August 28, 2004 consolidated balance sheet and increased retained earnings by approximately $0.9 million as of August 30, 2003 and August 31, 2002 as presented on the consolidated statements of shareholders equity.
Rental merchandise in service is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated service lives of the merchandise, which range from 6 to 36 months. In establishing estimated lives for merchandise in service, management considers historical experience and the intended use of the merchandise. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of operating profit for any period if management makes significant changes to these estimates.
Goodwill, Intangibles and Other Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is not amortized. SFAS No. 142 requires that companies test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis. In addition, SFAS 142 also requires that companies test goodwill if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit to which goodwill is assigned below its carrying amount. The Companys evaluation considers changes in the operating environment, competitive information, market trends, operating performance and cash flow modeling. Management completes its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and there have been no impairments of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets in fiscal 2005, 2004 or 2003. Future events could cause management to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill or other intangibles associated with previously acquired businesses are impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Property, plant and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets are depreciated or amortized over their useful lives. Useful lives are based on management estimates of the period that the assets will generate revenue. Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate an asset may be impaired. There have been no material impairments of property, plant and equipment, or definite-lived intangible assets in fiscal 2005, 2004, or 2003.
Insurance
The Company self-insures for certain obligations related to health, workers compensation, vehicles and general liability programs. The Company also purchases stop-loss insurance policies to protect itself from catastrophic losses. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the potential value associated with reported claims and for events that have occurred, but have not been reported. The Companys estimates consider historical claim experience and other factors. The Companys liabilities are based on estimates, and, while the Company believes that its accruals are adequate, the ultimate liability may be significantly different from the amounts recorded. Changes in claim experience, the Companys ability to settle claims or other estimates and judgments used by management could have a material impact on the amount and timing of expense for any given period.
Environmental and Other Contingencies
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of its business operations, including environmental matters, personal injury, customer contract matters and employment claims. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. The Company regularly consults with attorneys and outside consultants to ensure that all of the relevant facts and circumstances are considered, before a contingent liability is recorded. The Company records accruals for environmental and other contingencies based on enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, the Companys estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments, and the input of outside consultants and attorneys.
The estimated liability for environmental contingencies has been discounted using risk-free interest rates ranging from 4% to 5% over periods ranging from ten to thirty years. The estimated current costs, net of legal settlements with insurance carriers, have been adjusted for the estimated impact of inflation at 3% per year. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, managements estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments and the input of outside consultants and attorneys based on changing legal or factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for environmental and other contingent liabilities. Refer to Note 9 of these consolidated financial statements for additional discussion and analysis.
Asset Retirement Obligations
Effective September 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which generally applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset. Under this accounting method, the Company recognizes asset retirement obligations in the period in which they are incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The Company will depreciate, on a straight-line basis, the amount added to property and equipment and recognize accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the various remaining lives which range from approximately one to thirty years.
The estimated liability has been based on historical experience in decommissioning nuclear laundry facilities, estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, external vendor estimates as to the cost to decommission these assets in the future, and federal and state regulatory requirements. The estimated current costs have been adjusted for the estimated impact of inflation at 3% per year. The liability has been discounted using credit-adjusted risk-free rates that range from approximately 3% to 7% over one to thirty years. Revisions to the liability could occur due to changes in the Companys estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, estimated dates of decommissioning, changes in decommissioning costs, changes in federal or state regulatory guidance on the decommissioning of such facilities, or other changes in estimates. Changes due to revised estimates will be recognized by adjusting the carrying amount of the liability and the related long-lived asset if the assets are still in service, or charged to expense in the period if the assets are no longer in service.
Pensions
The calculation of pension expense and the corresponding liability requires the use of a number of critical assumptions, including the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the assumed discount rate. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and liability amounts, and future actual experience can differ from these assumptions. Pension expense increases as the expected rate of return on pension plan assets decreases. Future changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the participants in our pension plans will impact our future pension expense and liabilities. We cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the amounts recognized for income tax and financial reporting purposes at currently enacted tax rates. The Company computes income tax expense by jurisdiction based on its operations in each jurisdiction.
The Company is periodically reviewed by domestic and foreign tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due. These reviews include questions regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposure associated with various filing positions, the Company records estimated reserves for probable exposures, in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On October 13, 2004, the FASB concluded that SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payments, which would require companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments, including employee stock options. SFAS No. 123R was originally effective as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005, however SFAS No. 123R was deferred and is now effective for the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. As a result, the new standard will be effective for, and adopted by, the Company beginning August 28, 2005. In March 2005, the SEC issued SAB No. 107 regarding the SECs interpretation of SFAS No. 123R and the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. The Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123R and SAB No. 107. The Company believes the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R will not have a material impact on the results of operations of the Company. See Note 1(s) to these consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding stock based compensation.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials be recognized as current period charges. Further, SFAS No. 151 requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to the cost of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. Unallocated overheads must be recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application of the provisions of SFAS No. 151 is permitted for costs incurred after this statement was issued, but not required. The Company believes the impact of adopting SFAS No. 151 will not have a material impact on the results of operations of the Company.
Results of Operations
Revenues and certain expense items for the three fiscal years ended August 27, 2005, August 28, 2004 and August 30, 2003, and the percentage changes in revenues and certain expense items between years are presented in the following table. Operating costs presented below include merchandise costs related to the amortization of rental merchandise in service and direct sales as well as labor and other production, service and delivery costs associated with operating the Companys industrial laundries, Specialty Garments facilities, First-Aid locations and the Companys distribution center. Selling and administrative costs include costs related to the Companys sales and marketing functions as well as general and administrative costs associated with the Companys corporate offices and operating locations including information systems, engineering, materials management, manufacturing planning, finance, budgeting, and human resources.
FY 2005 |
% of Revenues |
FY 2004 |
% of Revenues |
FY 2003 |
% of Revenues |
% Change FY 2005 vs. FY 2004 |
% Change FY 2004 vs. FY 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 763,842 | 100.0 | % | $ | 719,356 | 100.0 | % | $ | 596,936 | 100.0 | % | 6.2 | % | 20.5 | % | ||||||||||
Costs and expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating costs (1) | 480,714 | 62.9 | 461,112 | 64.1 | 381,098 | 63.9 | 4.3 | 21.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling and administrative expenses (1) | 163,189 | 21.3 | 149,351 | 20.8 | 127,341 | 21.3 | 9.3 | 17.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 43,927 | 5.8 | 44,889 | 6.2 | 39,659 | 6.6 | -2.1 | 13.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
687,830 | 90.0 | 655,352 | 91.1 | 548,098 | 91.8 | 5.0 | 19.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Income from operations | 76,012 | 10.0 | 64,004 | 8.9 | 48,838 | 8.2 | 18.8 | 31.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other expense | 6,841 | 0.9 | 9,406 | 1.3 | 1,266 | 0.2 | -27.3 | 643.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 69,171 | 9.1 | 54,598 | 7.6 | 47,572 | 8.0 | 26.7 | 14.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 25,823 | 3.4 | 21,020 | 2.9 | 18,310 | 3.1 | 22.8 | 14.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
accounting change | 43,348 | 5.7 | 33,578 | 4.7 | 29,262 | 4.9 | 29.1 | 14.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change | -- | -- | -- | -- | 2,242 | 0.4 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 43,348 | 5.7 | % | $ | 33,578 | 4.7 | % | $ | 27,020 | 4.5 | % | 29.1 | % | 24.3 | % | ||||||||||
(1) Exclusive of depreciation and amortization
Revenues and income (loss) from operations by reporting segment for the three fiscal years ended August 27, 2005, August 28, 2004 and August 30, 2003, are presented in the following table (in thousands). Refer to Note 13 of these consolidated financial statements for discussion of the Companys reporting segments.
Revenues |
US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning |
MFG |
Net Interco MFG Elim |
Specialty Garments |
First-Aid |
Corporate |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For the year-ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
August 27, 2005 | $ | 668,313 | $ | 57,634 | $ | (57,634 | ) | $ | 61,697 | $ | 27,757 | $ | 6,075 | $ | 763,842 | ||||||||
For the year-ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
August 28, 2004 | $ | 629,309 | $ | 53,694 | $ | (53,694 | ) | $ | 58,598 | $ | 26,668 | $ | 4,781 | $ | 719,356 | ||||||||
For the year-ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
August 30, 2003 | $ | 524,701 | $ | 42,041 | $ | (42,041 | ) | $ | 57,749 | $ | 9,486 | $ | 5,000 | $ | 596,936 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning |
MFG |
Net Interco MFG Elim |
Specialty Garments |
First-Aid |
Corporate |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For the year-ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
August 27, 2005 | $ | 99,508 | $ | 21,390 | $ | 206 | $ | 6,907 | $ | 928 | $ | (52,927 | ) | $ | 76,012 | ||||||||
For the year-ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
August 28, 2004 | $ | 88,729 | $ | 20,299 | $ | (5,277 | ) | $ | 7,113 | $ | 1,722 | $ | (48,582 | ) | $ | 64,004 | |||||||
For the year-ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
August 30, 2003 | $ | 73,223 | $ | 13,837 | $ | (3,415 | ) | $ | 9,306 | $ | 45 | $ | (44,158 | ) | $ | 48,838 | |||||||
Revenues: In 2005, revenues increased 6.2% to $763.8 million as compared with $719.4 million for 2004, which was primarily attributable to organic growth within our existing operations of approximately 6.0%. This increase in existing operations was primarily due to revenue growth in the industrial laundry operations and Corporate which accounted for 5.4% of the increase. Revenues from Specialty Garments and First aid accounted for 0.4% and 0.2% of the increase, respectively. In addition, current year acquisitions contributed an additional 0.2% to the increase in revenues. The increase in revenue for 2005 was modest due to a particularly competitive pricing environment.
Operating costs: Operating costs increased to $480.7 million for 2005 as compared with $461.1 million for 2004. However, operating costs decreased as a percentage of revenues from 64.1% in 2004 to 62.9% in 2005. The primary reasons for this decrease were lower merchandise amortization as a result of cost savings realized in MFG, lower merchandise amortization for the industrial laundry locations acquired as part of the Textilease acquisition and lower industrial laundry production payroll costs as a percentage of revenues. These benefits were somewhat offset by higher energy costs associated with operating our industrial laundries and our fleet of delivery trucks.
Selling and administrative expenses: The Companys selling and administrative expenses increased to 21.3% of revenues in 2005, or $163.2 million, as compared to 20.8% of revenues in 2004, or $149.4 million. The increase in selling and administrative expenses is primarily due to an increase in the sales force within US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning. This growth within the sales force is the result of the Companys effort to foster increased revenue growth.
Depreciation and amortization: The Companys depreciation and amortization expense decreased to $43.9 million, or 5.8% of revenues for 2005, as compared with $44.9 million, or 6.2% of revenues for 2004. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily related to certain fixed assets owned by the Company becoming fully depreciated in fiscal 2004, as well as certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized in fiscal 2004 in US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning and Corporate. The decrease in depreciation and amortization also relates to a charge of approximately $0.6 million recorded by the Company to depreciation in 2004 related to the write-down, to net realizable value, of certain machinery and equipment at its Richmond industrial laundry location that closed during fiscal 2005.
Income from operations: The Companys income from operations increased $12.0 million to $76.0 million for the year ended August 27, 2005 as compared with $64.0 million for the year ended August 28, 2004. This increase is primarily due to an increase in income from operations during these periods of $10.8 million in US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning and an increase of $6.6 million in MFG, net of intercompany MFG elimination. These increases were offset by an increase in loss from operations of $4.3 million in Corporate, and lower income from operations of $0.8 million in First Aid and $0.2 million in Specialty Garments. The increase in US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning is due to increased revenues, lower operating costs as a percentage of revenues offset by higher selling and administrative costs as a percentage of revenues. The reasons for these fluctuations in revenues and cost are discussed above. The increase in the loss from operations in Corporate is due primarily to increased payroll and other costs related to the Companys distribution center and corporate offices offset by decreases in depreciation expense as discussed above. The decrease in income from operations in First Aid is primarily due to increased costs associated with this segments new pill packaging facility.
Other expense: The Companys net interest expense was $6.8 million, or 0.9% of revenues in 2005, as compared with $9.4 million, or 1.3% of revenues in 2004. The decrease in interest expense was due to a reduction in the level of debt outstanding during the fiscal year. The average debt outstanding in 2005 was $175.7 million as compared to $223.6 million in 2004. This was offset by lower income related to changes in the fair value of a $40 million interest rate swap, which generated only $0.2 million of income for the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005 as compared to $2.0 million of income for the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004
Provision for income taxes. The Companys effective income tax rate was 37.3% for the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005 and 38.5% for the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004. This decrease is due to a $0.5 million credit that the Company recorded in fiscal 2005 related to the reversal of tax reserves that were no longer required as well as changes in the provision required for foreign taxes.
Revenues: In 2004, revenues increased 20.5% to $719.4 million as compared with $596.9 million for 2003. The 20.5% increase can be attributed to acquisitions (11.9% related to US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning and 2.8% related to First Aid), primarily Textilease, as well as growth in existing operations of 5.8%. This increase in existing operations was primarily due to revenue growth in the industrial laundry operations which accounted for 5.6% of the increase. The increase in revenue due to price increases was modest due to a particularly competitive pricing environment.
Operating costs. Operating costs increased to $461.1 million for 2004 as compared with $381.1 million for 2003. As a percentage of revenues, operating costs increased to 64.1% from 63.9% for these periods, primarily due to significantly higher energy costs associated with operating industrial and Specialty Garments laundries as well as our fleet of delivery vehicles. Also, the Textilease industrial laundries, acquired in the first quarter of 2004, generally have higher production costs than the existing UniFirst facilities. The increase in operating costs is also attributable to the Companys closure of a redundant facility during the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004. In connection with its plans to integrate the operations of Textilease, the Company closed its Richmond plant and transferred the operations or the processing of garments to the Richmond plant acquired from Textilease. All costs incurred with the closure of the UniFirst Richmond plant, except the costs associated with the write-down to estimated fair value of certain machinery and equipment which is included in depreciation and amortization, have been recorded as operating costs during the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004. The Company also experienced an overall increase in merchandise costs due to high merchandise amortization recognized for the industrial laundry locations acquired in the Textilease acquisition. This increase in merchandise amortization was partially offset as a result of cost savings realized in MFG as well as improved garment utilization in US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning. In addition, the Companys operating costs increased as a percentage of revenues due to costs recorded in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2004 totaling $742 related to the decommissioning of one of the facilities of Specialty Garments.
Selling and administrative expenses. The Companys selling and administrative expenses increased to $149.4 million, or 20.8% of revenues, for 2004 as compared with $127.3 million, or 21.3% of revenues, for 2003. The decline in selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue is due to lower commissions and other selling costs as a result of a decrease in new sales generated by US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning during the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004 as compared to the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003. The Company has also begun to realize synergies in US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning from eliminating redundancies within the sales group from the acquisition of Textilease. The decrease in selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue is partially offset by the continuing rise of health care costs.
Depreciation and amortization. The Companys depreciation and amortization expense increased to $44.9 million, or 6.2% of revenues, for 2004, as compared with $39.7 million, or 6.6% of revenues, for 2003. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily related to the depreciation and amortization on the tangible and intangible assets acquired from Textilease in US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning and First Aid. The Company also recorded approximately $0.6 million in depreciation expense during the quarter ended May 29, 2004 related to the write-down, to estimated fair value, of certain machinery and equipment at UniFirst Richmond.
Income from operations. The Companys income from operations increased $15.2 million to $64.0 million for the year ended August 28, 2004 as compared with $48.8 million for the year ended August 30, 2003. This increase is primarily due to an increase in income from operations during these periods of $15.5 million in US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning, $4.6 million in MFG, net of intercompany MFG elimination and $1.7 million in First Aid, offset by an increase in loss from operations of $4.4 million in Corporate and lower income from operations of $2.2 million in Specialty Garments. The increase in US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning income from operations is due to increased revenues offset by higher operating costs and higher selling and administrative costs. The reasons for these fluctuations in revenues and cost are primarily related to the Textilease acquisition and other factors discussed above. The increase in income from operations in First Aid is due to a significant increase in revenues related to the acquisition of Textilease. The increase in the loss from operations in Corporate is due primarily to increased payroll and other costs related to the Companys distribution center and corporate offices as a result of the Textilease acquisition. The decrease in income from operations in Specialty Garments is due to minimal revenue growth offset by higher costs as a percentage of revenues. A large portion of this increase in costs is due to the $742 of costs related to the decommissioning of one of the facilities discussed above, increased depreciation expense, as well as higher other selling and administrative and payroll related costs.
Other expense (income). Other expense (income) (interest expense, interest rate swap expense (income) and interest income) was $9.4 million, or 1.3% of revenues, for 2004, as compared with $1.3 million, or 0.2% of revenues, for 2003. The increase in Other expense (income) was a result of the increased interest expense, which includes amortization of deferred financing costs of approximately $2.0 million associated with debt financing obtained in connection with the acquisition of Textilease. This is somewhat offset by an increase in the fair value of a $40 million interest rate swap, which generated $2.0 million of income for the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004, compared to $1.3 million of income for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003.
Provision for income taxes. The Companys effective income tax rate was 38.5% for each of the fiscal years ended August 28, 2004 and August 30, 2003.
Shareholders equity at August 27, 2005 was $412.3 million, or 70.0% of the Companys total capitalization.
General. For the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005, the Company had a net increase in cash and cash equivalents of $0.3 million. The Company completed the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005 with cash and cash equivalents of $4.7 million and working capital of $76.6 million. The Company believes that current cash and cash equivalent balances, cash generated from operations and amounts available under the Companys Amended Credit Agreement (as defined below) will be sufficient to meet the Companys anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months.
Sources and uses of cash. During the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005, the Company generated cash primarily from operating activities. The Companys operating activities provided net cash of $72.1 million, resulting primarily from net income of $43.3 million, amounts charged for depreciation and amortization of $43.9 million, increases in accounts payable and accruals of $5.6 million, a net decrease in inventories of $1.6 million, offset primarily by an increase in accounts receivable of $8.4 million, an increase in rental merchandise in service of $8.1 million, and a decrease in accrued and deferred income taxes of $7.1 million. The Company used its cash to, among other things, fund the acquisitions of businesses with an aggregate net purchase price of approximately $16.4 million, fund $53.3 million in capital expenditures to expand and update the Companys facilities, reduce its debt by $2.2 million, and pay approximately $2.6 million in cash dividends to Common and Class B Common shareholders.
Additional cash resources. In connection with the purchase of Textilease, the Company entered into a $285.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (the Credit Agreement), with a syndicate of banks. The Credit Agreement replaced the Companys previous $125.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement and, prior to its amendment, was due on the third anniversary of the Closing Date (September 2, 2006).
On June 14, 2004, the Company issued $165.0 million of fixed and floating rate notes pursuant to a Note Purchase Agreement (Note Agreement). Under the Note Agreement, the Company issued $75 million of notes with a seven year term bearing interest at 5.27% (Fixed Rate Notes). The Company also issued $90.0 million of floating rate notes due in ten years (Floating Rate Notes). Of the Floating Rate Notes, $75.0 million bear interest at LIBOR plus 70 basis points and may be repaid at face value two years from the date they were issued. The remaining $15.0 million of Floating Rate Notes bear interest at LIBOR plus 75 basis points and can be repaid at face value after one year. The Company also amended its Credit Agreement (Amended Credit Agreement) to, among other things, reduce the amount available for borrowing thereunder to $125.0 million and to reduce interest rates payable on such borrowings. As amended, loans under the Amended Credit Agreement bear interest at floating rates which vary based on the Companys funded debt ratio. The proceeds from the Fixed Rate Notes and the Floating Rate Notes were used to repay borrowings under the Credit Agreement. At August 27, 2005, the interest rates applicable to the Companys borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement ranged from LIBOR plus 100 basis points, or 4.57%, to the prime rate, or 6.50%.
The Amended Credit Agreement expires on September 2, 2007. As of August 27, 2005, the maximum line of credit was $125.0 million of which approximately $91.4 million was available for borrowing thereunder. As of such date, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $9.0 million and letters of credit of $24.6 million. Under the Amended Credit Agreement, the Company may borrow funds at variable interest rates based on the Eurodollar rate or the banks prime rate, as selected by the Company. Availability of credit requires compliance with financial and other covenants, including minimum tangible net worth, maximum funded debt ratio, and minimum debt coverage, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement. Compliance with these financial covenants is tested on a fiscal quarterly basis. Under the most restrictive of these provisions, the Company was required to maintain minimum consolidated tangible net worth of $138.4 million as of August 27, 2005. As of August 27, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Note Agreement and the Amended Credit Agreement.
Commitments and Contingencies
The Company and its operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous wastes and other substances. In particular, industrial laundries use and must dispose of detergent waste water and other residues. The Company is attentive to the environmental concerns surrounding the disposal of these materials and has, through the years, taken measures to avoid their improper disposal. In the past, the Company has settled, or contributed to the settlement of, actions or claims brought against the Company relating to the disposal of hazardous materials and there can be no assurance that the Company will not have to expend material amounts to remediate the consequences of any such disposal in the future.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. The Company regularly consults with attorneys and outside consultants to ensure that all of the relevant facts and circumstances are considered, before a contingent liability is recorded. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, managements estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments and the input of outside consultants and attorneys based on changing legal or factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for environmental and other contingent liabilities.
Under environmental laws, an owner or lessee of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances located on, or in, or emanating from such property, as well as related costs of investigation and property damage. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or lessee knew of or was responsible for the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. There can be no assurances that acquired or leased locations have been operated in compliance with environmental laws and regulations or that future uses or conditions will not result in the imposition of liability upon the Company under such laws or expose the Company to third-party actions such as tort suits. The Company continues to address environmental conditions under terms of consent orders negotiated with the applicable environmental authorities or otherwise with respect to sites located in or related to Woburn, Massachusetts, Uvalde, Texas, Springfield, Massachusetts, Stockton, California, and three sites related to former operations in Williamstown, Vermont.
In addition, the Company is investigating the extent of environmental contamination and potential exposure at sites it acquired in connection with its acquisition of Textilease, and it is defending against claims concerning alleged environmental conditions with respect to a site once owned by a former subsidiary in Somerville, Massachusetts. The Company has accrued certain costs related to the sites described above as it has been determined that the costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company also has potential exposure related to an additional parcel of land (the Central Area) related to the Woburn, Massachusetts site discussed above. Currently, the consent order for the Woburn, Massachusetts site discussed above does not define or require any remediation work in the Central Area. The Company has not accrued for this contingency as the Company believes, at this time, the liability is not probable and the amount of such contingent liability can not be reasonably estimated.
We routinely review and evaluate sites that may require remediation and monitoring and determine our estimated costs based on various estimates and assumptions. These estimates are developed using our internal sources or by third party environmental engineers or other service providers. Internally developed estimates are based on:
| Management's judgment and experience in remediating and monitoring our sites; |
| Information available from regulatory agencies as to costs of remediation and monitoring; |
| The number, financial resources and relative degree of responsibility of other potentially responsible parties (PRPs) who may be liable for remediation and monitoring of a specific site; and |
| The typical allocation of costs among PRPs. |
There is usually a range of reasonable estimates of the costs associated with each site. We generally use the amount within the range that constitutes our best estimate. When the Company believes that both the amount of a particular liability and the timing of the payments are reliably determinable, it adjusts the cost in current dollars using a rate of 3% for inflation until the time of expected payment and discounts the cost to present value using risk-free interest rates ranging from 4% to 5%.
For environmental liabilities that have been discounted, we include interest accretion, based on the effective interest method, within operating costs on the consolidated statement of income. The changes to our environmental liabilities for the years ended August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004 are as follows (in thousands):
Year ended |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning balance | $ | 8,669 | $ | 5,377 | ||||
Obligations assumed in connection with Textilease acquisition | -- | 3,200 | ||||||
Costs incurred for which reserves have been provided | (760 | ) | (859 | ) | ||||
Insurance proceeds received | 161 | 263 | ||||||
Interest accretion | 465 | 429 | ||||||
Revision in estimates | 791 | 259 | ||||||
Ending balance | $ | 9,326 | $ | 8,669 | ||||
Anticipated payments and insurance proceeds of currently identified environmental remediation liabilities as of August 27, 2005 for the next five years and thereafter as measured in current dollars are reflected below.
(In Thousands) |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Thereafter |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimated costs -- | |||||||||||||||||||||||
current dollars | $ | 1,864 | $ | 1,890 | $ | 1,793 | $ | 928 | $ | 773 | $ | 9,005 | $ | 16,253 | |||||||||
Estimated insurance | |||||||||||||||||||||||
proceeds | (247 | ) | (247 | ) | (247 | ) | (266 | ) | (247 | ) | (3,818 | ) | (5,072 | ) | |||||||||
Net anticipated costs | $ | 1,617 | $ | 1,643 | $ | 1,546 | $ | 662 | $ | 526 | $ | 5,187 | $ | 11,181 | |||||||||
Effect of Inflation | 2,971 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of Discounting | (4,826 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
August 27, 2005 | $ | 9,326 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated insurance proceeds are primarily received from an annuity received as part of a legal settlement with an insurance company. Annual proceeds of approximately $0.3 million are deposited into an escrow account which funds remediation and monitoring costs for three sites related to former operations in Williamstown, Vermont. Annual proceeds received but not expended in the current year accumulate in this account and may be used in future years for costs related to this site through the year 2027. As of August 27, 2005 the balance in this escrow account, which is held in a trust and is not recorded on the Companys consolidated balance sheet, was approximately $1.7 million. Also included in estimated insurance proceeds are amounts the Company is entitled to receive pursuant to legal settlements as reimbursements from three insurance companies for estimated costs at the site in Uvalde, Texas.
The Companys nuclear garment decontamination facilities are licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), or, in certain cases, by the applicable state agency, and are subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities. There can be no assurance that such regulation will not lead to material disruptions in the Companys garment decontamination business. From time to time, the Company is also subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of its business operations, including litigation related to charges for certain ancillary services on invoices, personal injury claims, customer contract matters, employment claims and environmental matters as described above.
While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to contingent liabilities, including lawsuits and environmental contingencies, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts accrued or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operation of the Company. It is possible, however, that the Companys future financial position and/or results of operations for any particular period could be materially affected by changes in the Companys assumptions or strategies related to these contingencies or changes out of the Companys control.
Other
On September 2, 2003 (Closing Date), the Company completed its acquisition of 100% of Textilease. The purchase price of approximately $175.6 million in cash was financed as part of a new $285.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (Credit Agreement), with a syndicate of banks.
At the time of acquisition, management initiated a plan to integrate certain Textilease facilities into existing operations. The Company included in the purchase price allocation an accrual for exit costs and employee termination benefits in accordance with EITF Issue No. 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination, of approximately $6.5 million, which included approximately $3.1 million in severance-related costs for corporate and field employees and $3.4 million in facility closing and lease cancellation costs. As of August 27, 2005, the Company had paid and charged approximately $2.5 million against this accrual for severance-related costs and $0.7 million for facility closing and lease cancellation costs. During the year ended August 28, 2004, the Company reversed approximately $2.0 million of the initial accrual based upon its final analysis of the fair value of the liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition, with a decrease in goodwill. The changes in accrual for the fiscal years ended August 28, 2004 and August 27, 2005 are as follows:
Severance Related Costs |
Facility Closing Costs |
Total | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at August 30, 2003 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | |||||
Initial set-up of liability | 3,103 | 3,401 | 6,504 | ||||||||
Cash payments | (1,815 | ) | (707 | ) | (2,522 | ) | |||||
Revisions | -- | (1,965 | ) | (1,965 | ) | ||||||
Balance at August 28, 2004 | $ | 1,288 | $ | 729 | $ | 2,017 | |||||
Cash payments | (680 | ) | -- | (680 | ) | ||||||
Balance at August 27, 2005 | $ | 608 | $ | 729 | $ | 1,337 | |||||
As part of the Companys business, the Company regularly evaluates opportunities to acquire other garment service companies. In recent years, the Company has typically paid for acquisitions with cash and may continue to do so in the future. To pay for an acquisition, the Company may use cash on hand, cash generated from operations or borrowings under the Companys Amended Credit Agreement, or the Company may pursue other forms of debt financing. The Companys ability to secure short-term and long-term debt financing in the future will depend on several factors, including the Companys future profitability, the levels of debt and equity and the overall credit and equity market environments.
Contractual Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments
The following information is presented as of August 27, 2005.
Payments Due by Fiscal Period | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Contractual Obligations |
Total |
Less than 1 year |
1 - 3 years |
3 - 5 years |
More than 5 years | ||||||||||||
Private placement | $ | 165,000 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 165,000 | |||||||
Revolving credit agreement | 8,950 | -- | 8,950 | -- | -- | ||||||||||||
Other debt | 2,721 | 1,084 | 1,138 | 237 | 262 | ||||||||||||
Total debt | 176,671 | 1,084 | 10,088 | 237 | 165,262 | ||||||||||||
Operating Leases | 9,255 | 3,781 | 4,441 | 1,033 | -- | ||||||||||||
Total Contractual Cash Obligations | $ | 185,926 | $ | 4,865 | $ | 14,529 | $ | 1,270 | $ | 165,262 | |||||||
The Company has borrowing capacity of $125.0 million under its Amended Credit Agreement. As of August 27, 2005, approximately $91.4 million was available for borrowing thereunder. Also, as of such date, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $9.0 million included in bank debt in the above schedule and letters of credit of $24.6 million.
Seasonality
Historically, the Companys revenues and operating results have varied from quarter to quarter and are expected to continue to fluctuate in the future. These fluctuations have been due to a number of factors, including: general economic conditions in the Companys markets; the timing of acquisitions and of commencing start-up operations and related costs; the effectiveness of integrating acquired businesses and start-up operations; the timing of nuclear plant outages; capital expenditures; seasonal rental and purchasing patterns of the Companys customers; and price changes in response to competitive factors. In addition, the Companys operating results historically have been lower during the second and fourth fiscal quarters. The operating results for any historical quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for an entire fiscal year or any other interim periods.
Effects of Inflation
In general, management believes that our results of operations are not dependent on moderate changes in the inflation rate. Historically, we have been able to manage the impacts of more significant changes in inflation rates through our customer relationships, customer agreements that generally provide for price increases consistent with the rate of inflation, and continued focus on improvements of operational productivity.
Significant increases in energy costs, specifically natural gas and gasoline, can materially affect our results of operations and financial condition. Currently, energy costs represent approximately 4% of our total revenue.
Forward looking statements contained in this annual report are subject to the safe harbor created by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are highly dependent upon a variety of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward looking statements. Such factors include uncertainties regarding the Companys ability to consummate and successfully integrate acquired businesses, uncertainties regarding any existing or newly-discovered expenses and liabilities related to environmental compliance and remediation, the Companys ability to compete successfully without any significant degradation in its margin rates, seasonal fluctuations in business levels, uncertainties regarding the price levels of natural gas, electricity, fuel, and labor, the impact of negative economic conditions on the Companys customers and such customers workforce, the extent of costs necessitated by, and declines in revenues from customers adversely affected by, the recent hurricanes in Florida and the Gulf Coast, the continuing increase in domestic healthcare costs, demand and prices for the Companys products and services, additional professional and internal costs necessary for compliance with recent and proposed future changes in Securities and Exchange Commission (including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), New York Stock Exchange, and accounting rules, strikes and unemployment levels, the Companys efforts to evaluate and potentially reduce internal costs, economic and other developments associated with the war on terrorism and its impact on the economy and general economic conditions. When used in this annual report, the words intend, anticipate, believe, estimate, and expect and similar expressions as they relate to the Company are included to identify such forward looking statements.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
Management has determined that all of the Companys foreign subsidiaries operate primarily in local currencies that represent the functional currencies of the subsidiaries. All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. The effect of exchange rate fluctuations on translation of assets and liabilities are recorded as a component of stockholders equity. Income and expense accounts are translated at average exchange rates during the year. As such, the Companys financial condition and operating results are affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar as compared to currencies in foreign countries. Revenue denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar represented approximately 7% of total consolidated revenues for the year ended August 27, 2005 and 6% for the years ended August 28, 2004 and August 30, 2003. Total assets denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar represented approximately 7% of total consolidated assets at August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004. If exchange rates had changed by 10% from the actual rates in effect during the year ended and as of August 27, 2005, the Companys revenues and assets for the year ended and as of August 27, 2005 would have changed by approximately $5.5 million and $5.2 million, respectively.
The Company does not operate a hedging program to mitigate the effect of a significant rapid change in the value of the Canadian Dollar, Euro, British Pound, or Mexican Peso as compared to the U.S. dollar. Any gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions, including exchange rate fluctuations on intercompany accounts are reported as transaction gains (losses) within selling and administrative expenses. The intercompany payables and receivables are denominated in Canadian Dollars, Euros, British Pounds and Mexican Pesos. During the year ended August 27, 2005 transaction gains (losses) included in selling and administrative expenses were not material. If the exchange rates had changed by 10% during the year ended August 27, 2005, the Company would have recognized an exchange gain or loss of approximately $0.1 million.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates which may adversely affect its financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In seeking to minimize the risks from interest rate fluctuations, the Company manages exposures through its regular operating and financing activities. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its borrowings under its $125.0 million Amended Credit Agreement with a syndicate of banks and its $90.0 million of Floating Rate Notes with a group of insurance companies. Under both agreements, the Company borrows funds at variable interest rates based on the Eurodollar rate or LIBOR rates. If the LIBOR and Eurodollar rates fluctuated by 10% from the actual rates in effect during the year ended August 27, 2005, interest expense would have fluctuated by approximately $0.3 million from the interest expense recognized for the year ended August 27, 2005.
Year ended (In thousands, except per share data) |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 |
August 30, 2003 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 763,842 | $ | 719,356 | $ | 596,936 | |||||
Cost and expenses: | |||||||||||
Operating costs (1) | 480,714 | 461,112 | 381,098 | ||||||||
Selling and administrative expenses (1) | 163,189 | 149,351 | 127,341 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 43,927 | 44,889 | 39,659 | ||||||||
687,830 | 655,352 | 548,098 | |||||||||
Income from operations | 76,012 | 64,004 | 48,838 | ||||||||
Other expense (income): | |||||||||||
Interest expense | 8,748 | 12,522 | 4,010 | ||||||||
Interest income | (1,684 | ) | (1,135 | ) | (1,452 | ) | |||||
Interest rate swap income | (223 | ) | (1,981 | ) | (1,292 | ) | |||||
6,841 | 9,406 | 1,266 | |||||||||
Income before income taxes | 69,171 | 54,598 | 47,572 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 25,823 | 21,020 | 18,310 | ||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | 43,348 | 33,578 | 29,262 | ||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change (net of income tax benefit of | |||||||||||
$1,404 in fiscal 2003) | -- | -- | 2,242 | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 43,348 | $ | 33,578 | $ | 27,020 | |||||
Income per Common share -- basic | |||||||||||
Before cumulative effect of an accounting change, net | $ | 2.51 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 1.71 | |||||
Cumulative effect of an accounting change, net | -- | -- | (0.13 | ) | |||||||
Net income per Common share -- basic | $ | 2.51 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 1.58 | |||||
Income per Class B Common share -- basic | |||||||||||
Before cumulative effect of an accounting change, net | $ | 2.01 | $ | 1.56 | $ | 1.37 | |||||
Cumulative effect of an accounting change, net | -- | -- | (0.10 | ) | |||||||
Net income per Class B Common share -- basic | $ | 2.01 | $ | 1.56 | $ | 1.27 | |||||
Income per Common share -- diluted | |||||||||||
Before cumulative effect of an accounting change, net | $ | 2.24 | $ | 1.74 | $ | 1.52 | |||||
Cumulative effect of an accounting change, net | -- | -- | (0.12 | ) | |||||||
Net income per Common share -- diluted | $ | 2.24 | $ | 1.74 | $ | 1.40 | |||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding -- basic | |||||||||||
Common stock | 9,428 | 9,103 | 8,992 | ||||||||
Class B Common Stock | 9,791 | 10,091 | 10,190 | ||||||||
19,219 | 19,194 | 19,182 | |||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding -- diluted | |||||||||||
Common stock | 19,311 | 19,258 | 19,222 | ||||||||
Dividends per share | |||||||||||
Common stock | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.15 | |||||
Class B Common Stock | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | $ | 0.12 | |||||
(1) Exclusive of depreciation and amortization
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated
financial statements.
(In thousands, except share data) |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets: | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,704 | $ | 4,436 | ||||
Receivables, less reserves of $3,179 for 2005 and $2,616 for 2004 | 78,497 | 69,471 | ||||||
Inventories | 31,021 | 32,604 | ||||||
Rental merchandise in service | 69,808 | 60,544 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets | 8,983 | 2,753 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 1,492 | 1,857 | ||||||
Total current assets | 194,505 | 171,665 | ||||||
Property and equipment: | ||||||||
Land, buildings and leasehold improvements | 260,515 | 240,018 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment | 268,272 | 258,736 | ||||||
Motor vehicles | 76,147 | 70,048 | ||||||
604,934 | 568,802 | |||||||
Less-- accumulated depreciation | 299,983 | 280,012 | ||||||
304,951 | 288,790 | |||||||
Goodwill | 187,793 | 180,685 | ||||||
Customer contracts, net | 50,572 | 51,572 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net | 5,909 | 6,301 | ||||||
Other assets | 4,575 | 3,353 | ||||||
$ | 748,305 | $ | 702,366 | |||||
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity | ||||||||
Current liabilities: | ||||||||
Current maturities of long-term obligations | $ | 1,084 | $ | 986 | ||||
Accounts payable | 36,720 | 33,754 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities | 76,141 | 72,824 | ||||||
Accrued income taxes | 3,992 | 6,197 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 117,937 | 113,761 | ||||||
Long-term obligations, net of current maturities | 175,587 | 177,855 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 42,439 | 42,043 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9) | ||||||||
Shareholders' equity: | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued | -- | -- | ||||||
Common stock, $0.10 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 9,600,838 and 9,276,479 | ||||||||
issued in 2005 and 2004, respectively | 960 | 928 | ||||||
Convertible Class B Common Stock, $0.10 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; | ||||||||
9,637,110 and 9,929,144 issued in 2005 and 2004, respectively | 964 | 993 | ||||||
Capital surplus | 13,462 | 13,138 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 394,910 | 354,154 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 2,046 | (506 | ) | |||||
Total shareholders' equity | 412,342 | 368,707 | ||||||
$ | 748,305 | $ | 702,366 | |||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated
financial statements.
(In thousands) |
Common Shares |
Class B Common Shares |
Treasury Shares |
Common Stock |
Class B Common Stock |
Treasury Stock |
Capital Surplus |
Retained Earnings |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance, August 31, 2002 | 10,555 | 10,205 | (1,535 | ) | $ | 1,055 | $ | 1,021 | $ | (24,756 | ) | $ | 12,503 | $ | 324,553 | $ | (3,678 | ) | $ | 310,698 | ||||||||||||
Net income | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 27,020 | -- | 27,020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency translation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustments | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1,904 | 1,904 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of derivative | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
instruments, net of tax | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 345 | 345 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 29,269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (2,572 | ) | -- | (2,572 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares converted | 30 | (30 | ) | -- | 3 | (3 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares repurchased | -- | -- | (60 | ) | -- | -- | (1,249 | ) | -- | -- | -- | (1,249 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised | 14 | -- | -- | 2 | -- | -- | 190 | -- | -- | 192 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, August 30, 2003 | 10,599 | 10,175 | (1,595 | ) | $ | 1,060 | $ | 1,018 | $ | (26,005 | ) | $ | 12,693 | $ | 349,001 | $ | (1,429 | ) | $ | 336,338 | ||||||||||||
Net income | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 33,578 | -- | 33,578 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustment | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (78 | ) | (78 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency translation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustments | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1,001 | 1,001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 34,501 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (2,579 | ) | -- | (2,579 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares converted | 246 | (246 | ) | -- | 25 | (25 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised, including | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tax benefit | 26 | -- | -- | 2 | -- | -- | 445 | -- | -- | 447 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Elimination of treasury shares | (1,595 | ) | -- | 1,595 | (159 | ) | -- | 26,005 | -- | (25,846 | ) | -- | -- | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance, August 28, 2004 | 9,276 | 9,929 | -- | $ | 928 | $ | 993 | $ | -- | $ | 13,138 | $ | 354,154 | $ | (506 | ) | $ | 368,707 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 43,348 | -- | 43,348 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustment | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (363 | ) | (363 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency translation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustments | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 2,915 | 2,915 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 45,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | (2,592 | ) | -- | (2,592 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares converted | 292 | (292 | ) | -- | 29 | (29 | ) | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised, including | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
tax benefit | 32 | -- | -- | 3 | -- | -- | 324 | -- | -- | 327 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, August 27, 2005 | 9,600 | 9,637 | -- | $ | 960 | $ | 964 | -- | $ | 13,462 | $ | 394,910 | $ | 2,046 | $ | 412,342 | ||||||||||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated
financial statements.
Year ended (In thousands) |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 |
August 30, 2003 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||||||
Net income | $ | 43,348 | $ | 33,578 | $ | 27,020 | |||||
Adjustments: | |||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net | -- | -- | 2,242 | ||||||||
Depreciation | 37,858 | 38,539 | 35,262 | ||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets | 6,069 | 6,350 | 4,397 | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 695 | 2,052 | -- | ||||||||
Accretion on asset retirement obligations | 511 | 431 | 292 | ||||||||
Interest rate swap income | (223 | ) | (1,981 | ) | (1,292 | ) | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: | |||||||||||
Receivables | (8,425 | ) | (1,984 | ) | (3,229 | ) | |||||
Inventories | 1,583 | 3,518 | (548 | ) | |||||||
Rental merchandise in service | (8,089 | ) | 9,750 | (4,225 | ) | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 365 | (615 | ) | (92 | ) | ||||||
Accounts payable | 2,966 | (1,654 | ) | 13,667 | |||||||
Accrued liabilities | 2,607 | 5,349 | (4,982 | ) | |||||||
Accrued and deferred income taxes | (7,149 | ) | 12,725 | (7,704 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 72,116 | 106,058 | 60,808 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired | (16,380 | ) | (179,972 | ) | (2,785 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of linen business | -- | 4,614 | -- | ||||||||
Capital expenditures | (53,255 | ) | (30,873 | ) | (37,919 | ) | |||||
Other | (803 | ) | (2,218 | ) | 8 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (70,438 | ) | (208,449 | ) | (40,696 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||||||
Proceeds from long term obligations | 9,179 | 351,716 | -- | ||||||||
Payments on long term obligations | (11,349 | ) | (245,196 | ) | (16,667 | ) | |||||
Payment of deferred financing costs | -- | (4,540 | ) | -- | |||||||
Repurchase of Common Stock | -- | -- | (1,249 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from exercise of Common Stock options | 437 | 372 | 192 | ||||||||
Payment of cash dividends | (2,592 | ) | (2,579 | ) | (2,572 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (4,325 | ) | 99,773 | (20,296 | ) | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes | 2,915 | 1,001 | 1,904 | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | 268 | (1,617 | ) | 1,720 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 4,436 | 6,053 | 4,333 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year | $ | 4,704 | $ | 4,436 | $ | 6,053 | |||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | |||||||||||
Interest paid | $ | 7,997 | $ | 13,841 | $ | 4,554 | |||||
Income taxes paid, net of refunds received | $ | 32,711 | $ | 8,571 | $ | 24,179 | |||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated
financial statements.
(Amounts in thousands, except per share and Common Stock options data)
(a) Business Description
UniFirst Corporation (the Company) is one of the largest providers of workplace uniforms and protective clothing in the United States. The Company designs, manufactures, personalizes, rents, cleans, delivers, and sells a wide range of uniforms and protective clothing, including shirts, pants, jackets, coveralls, jumpsuits, lab coats, smocks and aprons, and also rents industrial wiping products, floor mats, facility service products, other non-garment items, and provides first aid cabinet services and other safety supplies, to a variety of manufacturers, retailers and service companies. The Company serves businesses of all sizes in numerous industry categories. Typical customers include automobile service centers and dealers, delivery services, food and general merchandise retailers, food processors and service operations, light manufacturers, maintenance facilities, restaurants, service companies, soft and durable goods wholesalers, transportation companies, and others who require employee clothing for image, identification, protection or utility purposes. At certain specialized facilities, the Company also decontaminates and cleans work clothes that may have been exposed to radioactive materials and services special cleanroom protective wear. Typical customers for these specialized services include government agencies, research and development laboratories, high technology companies and utilities operating nuclear reactors. As discussed and described in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has five reporting segments, US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning, Manufacturing (MFG), Specialty Garments Rental and Cleaning (Specialty Garments), First Aid and Corporate. The operations of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment are referred to by the Company as its industrial laundry operations and the locations related to this reporting segment are referred to as industrial laundries.
(b) Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned. Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
(c) Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency of UniFirsts foreign operations is the local countrys currency. Transaction gains and losses, including gains and losses on intercompany transactions, are included in selling and administrative expenses, in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Assets and liabilities of operations outside the United States are translated into U.S. dollars using period-end exchange rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates in effect during each month during the fiscal year. The effects of foreign currency translation adjustments are included in shareholders equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Company reported in selling and administrative expenses, net, foreign currency transaction gains (losses) totaling $(0.2) million, $0.6 million, and $(0.3) million for the fiscal years ended August 27, 2005, August 28, 2004, and August 30, 2003, respectively.
(d) Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. There have been no changes in judgments or the method of determining estimates that had a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements for the periods presented.
(e) Fiscal Year
The Companys fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in August. For financial reporting purposes, fiscal 2005, fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003 had 52 weeks.
(f) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks and bank short-term investments with maturities of less than ninety days.
(g) Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments, which may expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk, include cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, notes payable and long-term obligations. Each of these financial instruments is recorded at cost, which approximates its fair value.
(h) Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company recognizes revenue from rental operations in the period in which the services are provided. Direct sale revenue is recognized in the period in which the product is shipped. Management judgments and estimates are used in determining the collectability of accounts receivable and evaluating the adequacy of allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company considers specific accounts receivable and historical bad debt experience, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and the age of outstanding balances as part of its evaluation. Changes in estimates are reflected in the period they become known. If the financial condition of the Companys customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. Material changes in its estimates may result in significant differences in the amount and timing of bad debt expense recognition for any given period.
(i) Inventories and Rental Merchandise in Service
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value, net of any reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the likelihood that new goods on hand can be sold to customers or used in rental operations. Historical inventory usage and current revenue trends are considered in estimating both excess and obsolete inventories. If actual product demand and market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required. The Company uses the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method to value its inventories. Inventories primarily consist of finished goods.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company changed its accounting policy for a portion of its inventories from last-in, first-out (LIFO), to the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method of accounting. This change had no impact on the consolidated statements of income for any period presented. The Company believes that the FIFO method is preferable to LIFO because (i) all of the Companys primary competitors currently use the FIFO inventory method, therefore, the change will make the comparison of results among these companies more consistent (ii) the change is consistent with the increased emphasis on consistency between Generally Accepted Accounting Principals (GAAP) in the United States and International Accounting Standards (IAS) which provide that the FIFO or weighted average methods are acceptable and does not provide for the use the LIFO method (iii) this change will result in all of the Companys inventories being valued consistently using the FIFO method of accounting and (iv) due to the current low inflation levels, the Companys inventory costs have remained fairly constant and are not expected to increase in the near future. Consistent with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, the Company has retroactively restated its prior financial statements. The impact of this change increased inventories, accrued income taxes, and retained earnings approximately $1.5 million, $0.6 million, and $0.9 million, respectively, on the August 28, 2004 consolidated balance sheet and increased retained earnings approximately $0.9 million as of August 30, 2003 and August 31, 2002 as presented on the consolidated statements of shareholders equity.
Rental merchandise in service is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated service lives of the merchandise, which range from 6 to 36 months. In establishing estimated lives for merchandise in service, management considers historical experience and the intended use of the merchandise. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of operating profit for any period if management makes significant changes to these estimates.
(j) Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. The Company provides for depreciation on the straight-line method based on the following estimated useful lives:
Buildings | 30-40 years |
Leasehold improvements | Term of lease |
Machinery and equipment | 3-10 years |
Motor vehicles | 3-5 years |
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized. The Company recorded as depreciation expense $37.9 million, $38.5 million, and $35.3 million for the fiscal years ended August 27, 2005, August 28, 2004, and August 30, 2003, respectively.
In accordance with Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, long-lived assets, including property, plant, and equipment, are evaluated for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate an asset may be impaired. There have been no material impairments of property, plant and equipment in fiscal 2005, 2004, or 2003.
(k) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is not amortized. SFAS No. 142 requires that companies test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis. In addition, SFAS 142 also requires that companies test goodwill if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit to which goodwill is assigned below its carrying amount. The Companys evaluation considers changes in the operating environment, competitive information, market trends, operating performance and cash flow modeling. Management completes its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and there have been no impairments of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets in fiscal 2005, 2004 or 2003. Future events could cause management to conclude that impairment indicators exist and that goodwill or other intangibles associated with previously acquired businesses are impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over useful lives, which are based on management estimates of the period that the assets will generate revenue. Definite-lived intangible assets are also evaluated for impairment in accordance with SFAS 144. There have been no impairments of definite-lived intangible assets in fiscal 2005, 2004, or 2003.
Customer contracts are amortized over their estimated useful lives, and have a weighted average useful life of approximately 14.5 years. Restrictive covenants are amortized over the terms of the respective non-competition agreements, and have a weighted average useful life of approximately 7.9 years. Other intangible assets, net, primarily includes deferred financing costs and trademarks, and have weighted average useful lives of approximately 7.1 years. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, the Company does not amortize goodwill. The Company recorded as amortization expense $6.1 million, $6.4 million, and $4.4 million for the fiscal years ended August 27, 2005, August 28, 2004, and August 30, 2003, respectively.
(l) Asset Retirement Obligations
Effective September 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligation, which generally applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset. Under this accounting method, the Company recognizes asset retirement obligations in the period in which they are incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The Company will depreciate, on a straight-line basis, the amount added to property and equipment and recognize accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the various remaining lives which range from approximately one to thirty years. The estimated liability has been based on historical experience in decommissioning nuclear laundry facilities, estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, external vendor estimates as to the cost to decommission these assets in the future, and federal and state regulatory requirements.
(m) Insurance
The Company self-insures for certain obligations related to health, workers compensation, vehicles and general liability programs. The Company also purchases stop-loss insurance policies to protect itself from catastrophic losses. Judgments and estimates are used in determining the potential value associated with reported claims and for events that have occurred, but have not been reported. The Companys estimates consider historical claims experience and other factors. The Companys liabilities are based on estimates, and, while the Company believes that its accruals are adequate, the ultimate liability may be significantly different from the amounts recorded. Changes in claim experience, the Companys ability to settle claims or other estimates and judgments used by management could have a material impact on the amount and timing of expense for any period.
(n) Environmental and Other Contingencies
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of its business operations, including environmental matters, personal injury, customer contract matters and employment claims. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. The Company regularly consults with attorneys and outside consultants to ensure that all of the relevant facts and circumstances are considered, before a contingent liability is recorded. The Company records accruals for environmental and other contingencies based on enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, the Companys estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments, and the input of outside consultants and attorneys.
The estimated liability for environmental contingencies has been discounted using risk-free interest rates ranging from 4% to 5% over periods ranging from ten to thirty years. The estimated current costs, net of legal settlements with insurance carriers, have been adjusted for the estimated impact of inflation at 3% per year. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, managements estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments and the input of outside consultants and attorneys based on changing legal or factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for environmental and other contingent liabilities. Refer to Note 9 of these consolidated financial statements for additional discussion and analysis.
(o) Pensions
The calculation of pension expense and the corresponding liability requires the use of a number of critical assumptions, including the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the assumed discount rate. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and liability amounts, and future actual experience can differ from these assumptions. Pension expense increases as the expected rate of return on pension plan assets decreases. Future changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the participants in our pension plans will impact our future pension expense and liabilities. We cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future.
(p) Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the amounts recognized for income tax and financial reporting purposes at currently enacted tax rates. The Company computes income tax expense by jurisdiction based on its operations in each jurisdiction.
The Company is periodically reviewed by domestic and foreign tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due. These reviews include questions regarding the timing and amount of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax jurisdictions. In evaluating the exposure associated with various filing positions, the Company records estimated reserves for probable exposures.
(q) Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are classified as sales and administrative expenses. The Company incurred advertising costs of $1.7 million, $1.5 million, and $1.2 million for the fiscal years ended August 27, 2005, August 28, 2004, and August 30, 2003, respectively.
(r) Net Income Per Share
In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue No. 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FAS 128. EITF Issue No. 03-6 provides guidance in determining when the two-class method, as defined in SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, must be utilized in calculating earnings per share. The Company was required to adopt EITF Issue No. 03-6 in the quarter ended August 28, 2004 and to apply the provisions of EITF Issue No. 03-6 retroactively to all periods presented. The Common Stock of the Company has a 25% dividend preference to the Class B Common Stock. The Class B Common Stock, which has ten votes per share as opposed to one vote per share for the Common Stock, is not freely transferable but may be converted at any time on a one-for-one basis into Common Stock at the option of the holder of the Class B Common Stock. EITF Issue No. 03-6 requires the income per share for each class of common stock to be calculated assuming 100% of the Companys earnings are distributed as dividends to each class of common stock based on their respective dividend rights, even though the Company does not anticipate distributing 100% of its earnings as dividends. The effective result of EITF Issue No. 03-6 is that the earnings per share for the Common Stock will be 25% greater than the earnings per share of the Class B Common Stock.
Basic earnings per share for the Companys Common Stock and Class B Common Stock is calculated by dividing net income allocated to Common Stock and Class B Common Stock by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock and Class B Common Stock outstanding, respectively. Diluted earnings per share for the Companys Common Stock assumes the conversion of all the Companys Class B Common Stock into Common Stock and the exercise of outstanding stock options under the Companys stock based employee compensation plans.
For the basic earnings per share calculation, net income available to the Companys shareholders is allocated among the Companys two classes of common stock; Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. The allocation among each class was based upon the two-class method. The following table shows how net income is allocated using this method:
Year ended |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 |
August 30, 2003 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net income available to shareholders | $ | 43,348 | $ | 33,578 | $ | 27,020 | |||||
Allocation of net income for Basic: | |||||||||||
Common Stock | $ | 23,677 | $ | 17,796 | $ | 14,171 | |||||
Class B Common Stock | 19,671 | 15,782 | 12,849 | ||||||||
$ | 43,348 | $ | 33,578 | $ | 27,020 | ||||||
The diluted earnings per share calculation assumes the conversion of all the Companys Class B Common Stock into Common Stock, so no allocation of earnings to Class B Common Stock is required.
The following table illustrates the weighted average number of Common and Class B Common shares outstanding during the year and is utilized in the calculation of earnings per share:
Year ended |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 |
August 30, 2003 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Weighted average number of Common shares -- basic | 9,428 | 9,103 | 8,992 | ||||||||
Add: effect of dilutive potential common shares -- employee Common Stock | |||||||||||
options | 92 | 64 | 40 | ||||||||
Add: effect assuming conversion of Class B Common shares into Common | |||||||||||
Stock | 9,791 | 10,091 | 10,190 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of Common shares -- diluted | 19,311 | 19,258 | 19,222 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of Class B Common shares -- basic | 9,791 | 10,091 | 10,190 | ||||||||
(s) Stock Based Compensation
The Company has stock-based employee compensation plans which are described in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements. The Company uses the intrinsic value method to account for the plans under APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, under which no compensation cost has been recognized related to stock option grants. The Company has adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. Had compensation cost for this plan been determined consistent with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Companys net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts for the following periods:
Year ended |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 |
August 30, 2003 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 43,348 | $ | 33,578 | $ | 29,262 | |||||
Less: pro forma compensation expense, net of tax | (308 | ) | (246 | ) | (171 | ) | |||||
Pro forma income before cumulative effect of accounting change | 43,040 | 33,332 | 29,091 | ||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | -- | -- | (2,242 | ) | |||||||
Pro forma net income | $ | 43,040 | $ | 33,332 | $ | 26,849 | |||||
As Reported Per Share Amounts: | |||||||||||
Basic net income per weighted average Common share: | |||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 2.51 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 1.71 | |||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | -- | -- | (0.13 | ) | |||||||
Net income per Common share | $ | 2.51 | $ | 1.95 | $ | 1.58 | |||||
Basic net income per weighted average Class B Common share: | |||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 2.01 | $ | 1.56 | $ | 1.37 | |||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | -- | -- | (0.10 | ) | |||||||
Net income per Class B Common share | $ | 2.01 | $ | 1.56 | $ | 1.27 | |||||
Diluted net income per weighted average Common share: | |||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 2.24 | $ | 1.74 | $ | 1.52 | |||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | -- | -- | (0.12 | ) | |||||||
Net income per Common share | $ | 2.24 | $ | 1.74 | $ | 1.40 | |||||
Pro-Forma Per Share Amounts: | |||||||||||
Basic net income per weighted average Common share: | |||||||||||
Pro forma income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 2.49 | $ | 1.94 | $ | 1.70 | |||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | -- | -- | (0.13 | ) | |||||||
Pro forma net income per Common share | $ | 2.49 | $ | 1.94 | $ | 1.57 | |||||
Basic net income per weighted average Class B Common share: | |||||||||||
Pro forma income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 1.99 | $ | 1.55 | $ | 1.36 | |||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | -- | -- | (0.10 | ) | |||||||
Pro forma net income per Class B Common share | $ | 1.99 | $ | 1.55 | $ | 1.26 | |||||
Diluted net income per weighted average Common share: | |||||||||||
Pro forma income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 2.23 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 1.51 | |||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | -- | -- | (0.12 | ) | |||||||
Pro forma net income per Common share | $ | 2.23 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 1.39 | |||||
As prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used:
2005 |
2004 |
2003 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Risk-free interest rate | 4.13 | % | 4.32 | % | 4.00 | % | |
Expected dividend yield | 0.76 | % | 1.00 | % | 1.00 | % | |
Expected life in years | 7.5 | 10 | 10 | ||||
Expected volatility | 38 | % | 30 | % | 30 | % |
The weighted average fair values of options granted during fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003 were $12.47, $11.90 and $8.63, respectively.
(t) Reclassifications
Certain amounts in prior years have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation. These reclassifications did not impact current or historical net income or shareholders equity and were not material.
(u) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On October 13, 2004, the FASB concluded that SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payments, which would require companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments, including employee stock options. SFAS No. 123R was originally effective as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005, however SFAS No. 123R was deferred and is now effective for the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. As a result, the new standard will be effective for, and adopted by, the Company beginning August 28, 2005. In March 2005, the SEC issued SAB No. 107 regarding the SECs interpretation of SFAS No. 123R and the valuation of share-based payments for public companies. The Company is evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 123R and SAB No. 107. The Company believes the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R will not have a material impact on the results of operations of the Company. See Note 1(s) to these consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding stock based compensation.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials be recognized as current period charges. Further, SFAS No. 151 requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to the cost of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. Unallocated overheads must be recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application of the provisions of SFAS No. 151 is permitted for costs incurred after this statement was issued, but not required. The Company believes the impact of adopting SFAS No. 151 will not have a material impact on the results of operations of the Company.
On September 2, 2003 (Closing Date), the Company completed its acquisition of 100% of Textilease Corporation (Textilease). The purchase price of approximately $175.6 million in cash was financed as part of a new $285.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (Credit Agreement), with a syndicate of banks. The Credit Agreement, completed on the Closing Date, replaced the Companys previous $125.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement which was due on the third anniversary of the Closing Date (September 2, 2006). Please see Note 4 Long Term Obligations. Availability of credit required compliance with financial and other covenants, including maximum leverage, minimum fixed charge coverage, and minimum tangible net worth, as defined in the Credit Agreement. Textilease, headquartered in Beltsville, Maryland, had fiscal year 2002 revenues of approximately $95.0 million. It serviced over 25,000 uniform and textile products customers from 12 locations in six southeastern states, and also serviced a wide range of large and small first-aid service customers from additional specialized facilities. Textileases operating results have been included in the Companys consolidated operating results since September 2, 2003.
The following is the final allocation of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The Company engaged a third party to appraise the fair value of the acquired tangible and intangible assets. The third party has completed its appraisal and the purchase price allocation below reflects the appraised values of acquired tangible and intangible assets. The Company has also completed its analysis of the fair values of the liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition, including certain liabilities that qualify for recognition under EITF Issue No. 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination.
Assets: | |||||
Current assets | $ | 33,400 | |||
Property and equipment | 21,557 | ||||
Goodwill | 115,413 | ||||
Intangible assets subject to amortization (estimated fifteen year weighted-average useful life): | 40,060 | ||||
Other assets | 109 | ||||
Total assets acquired | $ | 210,539 | |||
Liabilities: | |||||
Current liabilities | $ | 16,938 | |||
Deferred compensation | 5,249 | ||||
Deferred income taxes | 10,719 | ||||
Long-term debt | 2,005 | ||||
Total liabilities assumed | $ | 34,911 | |||
Net assets acquired | $ | 175,628 | |||
Subsequent to the Closing Date but prior to the end of the purchase price allocation period, the Company sold a portion of the linen businesses acquired from Textilease for approximately $4.6 million in cash. The Company allocated the proceeds of these sales as a reduction in merchandise in service, an increase to deferred tax liabilities, and a net reduction in goodwill of $2.3 million. This sale of the linen businesses acquired did not result in any gain or loss recorded on the Companys consolidated statement of income.
The $115.4 million of goodwill as of August 28, 2004 has been assigned to the Companys US Rental and Cleaning operating segment. This operating segment purchases, rents, cleans, delivers and sells, uniforms and protective clothing and non-garment items in the United States. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion of the Companys operating segments. None of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. At the time of acquisition, management initiated a plan to integrate certain Textilease facilities into existing operations. Included in the purchase price allocation is an accrual for exit costs and employee termination benefits in accordance with EITF Issue No. 95-3 of approximately $6.5 million, which included approximately $3.1 million in severance-related costs for corporate and field employees and $3.4 million in facility closing and lease cancellation costs. As of August 27, 2005, the Company paid and charged approximately $2.5 million against this accrual for severance-related costs and $0.7 million for facility closing and lease cancellation costs. During the year ended August 28, 2004, the Company reversed approximately $2.0 million of the initial accrual based upon its final analysis of the fair value of the liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition, with a decrease in goodwill. The changes in accrual for the fiscal years ended August 28, 2004 and August 27, 2005 are as follows:
Severance Related Costs |
Facility Closing Costs |
Total | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at August 30, 2003 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | -- | |||||
Initial set-up of liability | 3,103 | 3,401 | 6,504 | ||||||||
Cash payments | (1,815 | ) | (707 | ) | (2,522 | ) | |||||
Revisions | -- | (1,965 | ) | (1,965 | ) | ||||||
Balance at August 28, 2004 | $ | 1,288 | $ | 729 | $ | 2,017 | |||||
Cash payments | (680 | ) | -- | (680 | ) | ||||||
Balance at August 27, 2005 | $ | 608 | $ | 729 | $ | 1,337 | |||||
Supplemental Pro Forma Information
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed statements of income for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003 gives effect to the acquisition of Textilease and related financing as if the Textilease acquisition and the related financing had occurred on August 31, 2002. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed statements of income for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003, include the consolidated statements of income of UniFirst for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003, and the unaudited statements of operations of Textilease for the twelve months ended June 30, 2003, and pro forma adjustments to reflect the Textilease acquisition and the related financing. Textilease previously had a fiscal year ending on December 31.
The pro forma adjustments include additional interest expense of approximately $5.9 million for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003, related to the debt used to finance the acquisition, additional depreciation and amortization of approximately $2.1 million for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003, related to the estimated increase to the fair value of property and equipment and intangible assets and the related income tax effects of approximately $3.2 million for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003.
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed statements of income are not necessarily indicative of the financial results that would have occurred if the Textilease acquisition and the related financing had been consummated on August 31, 2002, nor are they necessarily indicative of the financial results which may be attained in the future.
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed statement of income for the year ended August 30, 2003 is based upon available information and certain assumptions that UniFirsts management believes are reasonable. The Textilease acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting.
Year ended |
August 30, 2003 (Pro Forma) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 691,937 | |||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 26,796 | |||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | 2,242 | ||||
Net income | $ | 24,554 | |||
Basic net income per weighted average Common share, as reported: | |||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 1.56 | |||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | (0.13 | ) | |||
Net income per Common share | $ | 1.43 | |||
Basic net income per weighted average Class B Common share, as reported: | |||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 1.25 | |||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | (0.10 | ) | |||
Net income per Class B Common share | $ | 1.15 | |||
Diluted net income per weighted average Common share, as reported: | |||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change | $ | 1.39 | |||
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax | (0.12 | ) | |||
Net income per Common share | $ | 1.27 | |||
During the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005, the Company completed seventeen acquisitions. The aggregate purchase price for these acquisitions was approximately $16.4 million, net of liabilities assumed of approximately $0.4 million. During the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004, the Company completed seven acquisitions, other than Textilease. The aggregate purchase price of these acquisitions was approximately $4.4 million, net of debt assumed of $0.4 million. The results of operations of these acquisitions have been included on the Companys consolidated financial statements since their respective acquisition dates. None of these acquisitions were significant, individually or in the aggregate, in relation to the Companys consolidated financial statements and, therefore, pro forma financial information has not been presented.
Aggregate information relating to the acquisition of businesses which were accounted for as purchases is as follows:
Year ended |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 |
August 30, 2003 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tangible assets acquired | $ | 2,690 | $ | 56,079 | $ | 598 | |||||
Intangible assets and goodwill acquired | 14,112 | 159,204 | 2,479 | ||||||||
Liabilities assumed | (422 | ) | (35,311 | ) | (292 | ) | |||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired | $ | 16,380 | $ | 179,972 | $ | 2,785 | |||||
Tangible assets acquired primarily relate to cash, accounts receivable, inventory and property, plant and equipment. Liabilities assumed primarily relate to accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and deferred taxes payable.
The following are the intangible assets and goodwill acquired for the years ended August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004 and the respective periods over which the assets will be amortized on a straight-line basis:
Year ended |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 |
Life in Years | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Goodwill | $ | 8,814 | $ | 118,077 | N/A | ||||||
Customer contracts | 3,844 | 39,823 | 10-15 | ||||||||
Covenants not to compete | 904 | 174 | 3-5 | ||||||||
Other intangible assets | 550 | 1,130 | 8 | ||||||||
Total intangible assets and goodwill acquired | $ | 14,112 | $ | 159,204 | |||||||
The amount assigned to intangible assets acquired was based on their respective fair values determined as of the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the tangible and intangible assets was recorded as goodwill, of which 100% was allocated to the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning segment for both 2005 and 2004. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the goodwill is not being amortized and will be tested for impairment as required at least annually.
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
Year ended |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 |
August 30, 2003 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current: | |||||||||||
Federal | $ | 23,121 | $ | 14,928 | $ | 14,076 | |||||
Foreign | 2,314 | 2,173 | 2,142 | ||||||||
State | 2,906 | 1,957 | 2,026 | ||||||||
$ | 28,341 | $ | 19,058 | $ | 18,244 | ||||||
Deferred: | |||||||||||
Federal | $ | (2,012 | ) | $ | 1,528 | $ | 60 | ||||
Foreign | (178 | ) | 259 | -- | |||||||
State | (328 | ) | 175 | 6 | |||||||
$ | (2,518 | ) | $ | 1,962 | $ | 66 | |||||
$ | 25,823 | $ | 21,020 | $ | 18,310 | ||||||
The following table reconciles the provision for income taxes using the statutory federal income tax rate to the actual provision for income taxes:
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 |
August 30, 2003 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Income taxes at the statutory federal income tax rate | $ | 24,210 | $ | 19,109 | $ | 16,650 | |||||
State income taxes | 1,679 | 1,408 | 1,315 | ||||||||
Permanent and other | 434 | 503 | 345 | ||||||||
Reduction of tax reserves | (500 | ) | -- | -- | |||||||
$ | 25,823 | $ | 21,020 | $ | 18,310 | ||||||
In the year ending August 27, 2005, the Company recorded a $0.5 million credit to income taxes related to the reduction of tax-related reserves that were no longer required.
The tax effect of items giving rise to the Companys deferred tax (assets) liabilities is as follows:
Year ended |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 |
August 30, 2003 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rental merchandise in service | $ | 12,765 | $ | 15,738 | $ | 8,612 | |||||
Tax in excess of book depreciation | 30,206 | 29,612 | 25,730 | ||||||||
Purchased intangible assets | 14,694 | 13,866 | -- | ||||||||
Accruals and other | (24,209 | ) | (19,926 | ) | (14,885 | ) | |||||
Net deferred tax liabilities | $ | 33,456 | $ | 39,290 | $ | 19,457 | |||||
The Company has evaluated its deferred tax assets and believes that they will be fully recovered. As a result, the Company has not established a valuation allowance.
Long-term obligations outstanding on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Series A, fixed rate notes due June 2011 bearing interest at 5.27% | $ | 75,000 | $ | 75,000 | ||||
Series B, floating rate notes due June 2014 bearing interest at LIBOR plus 70 basis | ||||||||
points (4.10%) | 75,000 | 75,000 | ||||||
Series C, floating rate notes due June 2014 bearing interest at LIBOR plus 75 basis | ||||||||
points (4.15%) | 15,000 | 15,000 | ||||||
Unsecured revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks, weighted-average | ||||||||
interest rates of 5.43% and 2.84% at August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004, respectively | 8,950 | 10,560 | ||||||
Other | 2,721 | 3,281 | ||||||
176,671 | 178,841 | |||||||
Less-- current maturities | 1,084 | 986 | ||||||
$ | 175,587 | $ | 177,855 | |||||
Aggregate current maturities of long-term obligations for the five fiscal years subsequent to August 27, 2005 and thereafter are as follows:
Fiscal year ending August: | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 | $ | 1,084 | |||
2007 | 602 | ||||
2008 | 9,486 | ||||
2009 | 173 | ||||
2010 | 64 | ||||
Thereafter | 165,262 | ||||
Total | $ | 176,671 | |||
In connection with the purchase of Textilease, the Company entered into a $285.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement (Credit Agreement), with a syndicate of banks. The Credit Agreement replaced the Companys previous $125.0 million unsecured revolving credit agreement and, prior to its amendment, was due on the third anniversary of the Closing Date (September 2, 2006). On June 14, 2004, the Company issued $165.0 million of fixed and floating rate notes pursuant to a Note Purchase Agreement (Note Agreement). Under the Note Agreement, the Company issued $75.0 million of notes with a seven year term (June 2011) bearing interest at 5.27% (Fixed Rate Notes). The Company also issued $90.0 million of floating rate notes due in ten years (June 2014) (Floating Rate Notes). Of the Floating Rate Notes, $75.0 million bear interest at LIBOR plus 70 basis points and may be repaid at face value two years from the date they are issued. The remaining $15.0 million of Floating Rate Notes bear interest at LIBOR plus 75 basis points and can be repaid at face value after one year. The Company also amended its Credit Agreement (Amended Credit Agreement) to, among other things, reduce the amount available for borrowing thereunder to $125.0 million and to reduce interest rates payable on such borrowings. As amended, loans under the Amended Credit Agreement bear interest at floating rates which vary based on the Companys funded debt ratio. The proceeds from the Fixed Rate Notes and the Floating Rate Notes were used to repay borrowings under the Credit Agreement. At August 27, 2005, the interest rates applicable to the Companys borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement ranged from LIBOR plus 100 basis points, or 4.57%, to the prime rate, or 6.50%.
The Amended Credit Agreement expires on September 2, 2007. As of August 27, 2005, the maximum line of credit was $125.0 million of which approximately $91.4 million was available for borrowing thereunder. As of such date, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $9.0 million and outstanding letters of credit of $24.6 million. Under the Amended Credit Agreement, the Company may borrow funds at variable interest rates based on the Eurodollar rate or the banks prime rate, as selected by the Company. Availability of credit requires compliance with financial and other covenants, including minimum tangible net worth, maximum funded debt ratio, and minimum debt coverage, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement. Compliance with these financial covenants is generally tested on a fiscal quarterly basis. Under the most restrictive of these provisions, the Company was required to maintain minimum consolidated tangible net worth of $138.4 million as of August 27, 2005. As of August 27, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the Note Agreement and the Amended Credit Agreement.
The Company accounts for interest rate swap agreements in accordance with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. In October 1999, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $40.0 million (the $40.0 million SWAP), which matured on October 13, 2004. Under the agreement, the Company paid a fixed rate of 6.38% and receives a variable rate tied to the three month LIBOR rate. On October 15, 2002, the bank had the option to terminate the $40.0 million SWAP without further obligation to make payments to the Company. The bank did not exercise the option. Due to the existence of this termination option, the $40.0 million SWAP did not meet the criteria to qualify as a cash flow hedge under SFAS No. 133. Accordingly, the Company has recorded, in the interest rate swap income line item of its consolidated statements of income, income of $0.2 million, $2.0 million, and $1.3 million for the fiscal years ended August 27, 2005, August 28, 2004, and August 30, 2003, respectively, for the changes in the fair value of $40.0 million SWAP. As of August 28, 2004, $0.2 million of interest rate swap related liabilities is included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
In June 2001, the Company entered into a second interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $20.0 million (the $20.0 million SWAP), which matured June 5, 2003. Under the agreement, the Company paid a fixed rate of 4.69% and received a variable rate tied to the three month LIBOR rate. At maturity, the applicable variable rate was 1.34%. The $20.0 million SWAP met the required criteria as defined in SFAS No. 133 for hedge accounting. Accordingly, the Company has recorded, through the other comprehensive loss section of shareholders equity, income of $0.3 million, net of tax of $0.2 million for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003.
Defined Contribution Retirement Savings Plan
The Company has a defined contribution retirement savings plan with a 401(k) feature for all eligible employees not under collective bargaining agreements. The Company matches a portion of the employees contribution and can make an additional contribution at its discretion. Contributions charged to expense under the plan were $7.9 million in 2005, $7.3 million in 2004 and $5.9 million in 2003.
Pension Plans and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans
The Company accounts for its pension plans and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan in accordance with SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions. Under SFAS No. 87, pension expense is recognized on an accrual basis over employees estimated service periods. Pension expense calculated under SFAS No. 87 is generally independent of funding decisions or requirements.
The Company maintains an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) for certain eligible employees of the Company. The benefits are based on the employees compensation upon retirement. The amount charged to expense related to this plan amounted to approximately $0.5 million, $0.4 million, and $0.4 million in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. The Company had accrued liabilities related to this plan of approximately $3.3 million at August 27, 2005.
The Company maintains a non-contributory defined pension plan (UniFirst Plan) covering union employees at one of its locations. The benefits are based on years of service and the employees compensation. The plan assets primarily consist of fixed income and equity securities. The amount charged to expense related to this plan amounted to approximately $0.2 million in each of the fiscal years ended 2005, 2004, and 2003. The Company had accrued liabilities related to this plan of approximately $0.2 million at August 27, 2005.
In connection with the acquisition of Textilease in fiscal year 2004, the Company assumed liabilities related to a frozen pension plan covering many former Textilease employees (Textilease Plan). The pension benefits are based on years of service and the employees compensation. The plan assets primarily consist of fixed income and equity securities. The amount charged to expense related to this plan amounted to approximately $0.1 million and $0.2 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company had accrued liabilities related to this plan of approximately $1.0 million at August 27, 2005.
The Companys obligations and funded status related to its pension and SERP retirement plans as of August 27, 2005 were as follows:
Textilease Plan |
UniFirst Plan |
SERP | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Change in benefit obligation: | |||||||||||
Projected benefit obligation, beginning of year | $ | 2,526 | $ | 2,415 | $ | 4,209 | |||||
Service cost | -- | 111 | 139 | ||||||||
Interest cost | 149 | 138 | 246 | ||||||||
Actuarial (gain) loss | 204 | 25 | 188 | ||||||||
Benefits paid | (313 | ) | (80 | ) | (205 | ) | |||||
Projected benefit obligation, end of year | $ | 2,566 | $ | 2,609 | $ | 4,577 | |||||
Change in plan assets: | |||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of year | $ | 1,246 | $ | 1,965 | $ | -- | |||||
Actual return on plan assets | 85 | 152 | -- | ||||||||
Employer contributions | 516 | 410 | 205 | ||||||||
Benefits paid | (313 | ) | (80 | ) | (205 | ) | |||||
Fair value of plan assets, end of year | $ | 1,534 | $ | 2,447 | $ | -- | |||||
Funded status: | $ | (1,032 | ) | $ | (162 | ) | $ | (4,577 | ) | ||
Unrecognized prior service cost | -- | 206 | 28 | ||||||||
Unrecognized actuarial loss | 196 | 245 | 1,229 | ||||||||
Net amount recognized | $ | (836 | ) | $ | 289 | $ | (3,320 | ) | |||
The amounts recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as of August 27, 2005 are as follows:
Textilease Plan |
UniFirst Plan |
SERP | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intangible assets | $ | -- | $ | 206 | $ | -- | |||||
Accrued liabilities | (1,032 | ) | (162 | ) | (3,320 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income | 196 | 245 | -- | ||||||||
Net amount recognized | $ | (836 | ) | $ | 289 | $ | (3,320 | ) | |||
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the year ended August 27, 2005 were as follows:
Textilease Plan |
UniFirst Plan |
SERP | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Service cost | $ | -- | $ | 111 | $ | 139 | |||||
Interest cost | 149 | 138 | 246 | ||||||||
Expected return on assets | (104 | ) | (107 | ) | -- | ||||||
Amortization of prior service cost | -- | 17 | 67 | ||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized (gain) loss | -- | 3 | 52 | ||||||||
Other | 13 | -- | -- | ||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 58 | $ | 162 | $ | 504 | |||||
The calculation of pension expense and the corresponding liability requires the use of a number of critical assumptions, including the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and the assumed discount rate. Changes in these assumptions can result in different expense and liability amounts, and future actual experience can differ from these assumptions. Pension expense increases as the expected rate of return on pension plan assets decreases. Future changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the participants in our pension plans will impact our future pension expense and liabilities. We cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future.
As of August 27, 2005, the accumulated benefit obligation for the Textilease Plan, UniFirst Plan, and SERP was $2.6 million, $2.6 million, and $3.3 million, respectively.
The assumptions used in calculating our projected benefit obligation and net periodic service cost as of, and for the year ended, August 27, 2005, were as follows:
Textilease Plan |
UniFirst Plan |
SERP | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Discount rate | 5.75 | % | 5.75 | % | 6.00 | % | |
Expected return on plan assets | 8.00 | % | 5.00 | % | N/A |
Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill is no longer amortized, but reviewed annually, or more frequently if certain indicators arise, for impairment. There were no impairment losses related to goodwill or intangible assets during the years ended August 27, 2005, August 28, 2004, and August 30, 2003.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows:
Balance as of August 30, 2003 | $ | 62,608 | |||
Goodwill acquired during the period | 118,077 | ||||
Balance as of August 28, 2004 | $ | 180,685 | |||
Goodwill acquired during the period | 8,814 | ||||
Change in purchase accounting estimates from acquisitions in prior years | (1,933 | ) | |||
Effect of foreign currency translation | 213 | ||||
Other | 14 | ||||
Balance as of August 27, 2005 | $ | 187,793 | |||
As of August 27, 2005, the Company has allocated $183.9 million and $3.9 million to its US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning and Specialty Garments segments, respectively. The change in the purchase accounting estimates from acquisitions in prior years primarily relates to revisions of tax estimates.
Intangible assets, net on the Companys accompanying consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
August 27, 2005 |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Amount | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Customer contracts | $ | 93,625 | $ | 43,053 | $ | 50,572 | |||||
Restrictive covenants | 17,688 | 15,375 | 2,313 | ||||||||
Other intangible assets | 6,069 | 2,473 | 3,596 | ||||||||
$ | 117,382 | $ | 60,901 | $ | 56,481 | ||||||
August 28, 2004 |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Carrying Amount | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Customer contracts | $ | 89,656 | $ | 38,084 | $ | 51,572 | |||||
Restrictive covenants | 16,661 | 14,478 | 2,183 | ||||||||
Other intangible assets | 5,510 | 1,392 | 4,118 | ||||||||
$ | 111,827 | $ | 53,954 | $ | 57,873 | ||||||
Estimated amortization expense for the five fiscal years subsequent to August 27, 2005 and thereafter, based on intangible assets, net as of August 27, 2005 is as follows:
2006 | $ | 6,522 | |||
2007 | 6,349 | ||||
2008 | 5,563 | ||||
2009 | 5,398 | ||||
2010 | 5,140 | ||||
Thereafter | 27,509 | ||||
$ | 56,481 | ||||
Accrued liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets consists of the following:
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Payroll related | $ | 25,877 | $ | 25,477 | ||||
Insurance related | 22,178 | 20,285 | ||||||
Environmental related | 9,326 | 8,669 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligations | 6,918 | 7,446 | ||||||
Acquisition related | 1,337 | 2,017 | ||||||
Other | 10,505 | 8,930 | ||||||
$ | 76,141 | $ | 72,824 | |||||
Lease Commitments
The Company leases certain buildings from independent parties. Total rent expense on all leases was $6.1 million, $6.6 million, and $3.3 million in fiscal 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. Annual minimum lease commitments for the five years subsequent to August 27, 2005 and thereafter are as follows:
2006 | $ | 3,781 | |||
2007 | 2,633 | ||||
2008 | 1,808 | ||||
2009 | 781 | ||||
2010 | 252 | ||||
Thereafter | -- | ||||
$ | 9,255 | ||||
Environmental and Legal Contingencies
The Company and its operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations governing, among other things, the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous wastes and other substances. In particular, industrial laundries use and must dispose of detergent waste water and other residues. The Company is attentive to the environmental concerns surrounding the disposal of these materials and has, through the years, taken measures to avoid their improper disposal. In the past, the Company has settled, or contributed to the settlement of, actions or claims brought against the Company relating to the disposal of hazardous materials and there can be no assurance that the Company will not have to expend material amounts to remediate the consequences of any such disposal in the future.
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that a liability for contingencies be recorded when it is probable that a liability has occurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Significant judgment is required to determine the existence of a liability, as well as the amount to be recorded. The Company regularly consults with attorneys and outside consultants to ensure that all of the relevant facts and circumstances are considered, before a contingent liability is recorded. Changes in enacted laws, regulatory orders or decrees, managements estimates of costs, insurance proceeds, participation by other parties, the timing of payments and the input of outside consultants and attorneys based on changing legal or factual circumstances could have a material impact on the amounts recorded for environmental and other contingent liabilities.
Further, under environmental laws, an owner or lessee of real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances located on, or in, or emanating from such property, as well as related costs of investigation and property damage. Such laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner or lessee knew of or was responsible for the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. There can be no assurances that acquired or leased locations have been operated in compliance with environmental laws and regulations or that future uses or conditions will not result in the imposition of liability upon the Company under such laws or expose the Company to third-party actions such as tort suits. The Company continues to address environmental conditions under terms of consent orders negotiated with the applicable environmental authorities or otherwise with respect to sites located in or related to Woburn, Massachusetts, Uvalde, Texas, Springfield, Massachusetts, Stockton, California, and three sites related to former operations in Williamstown, Vermont.
In addition, the Company is investigating the extent of environmental contamination and potential exposure at sites it acquired in connection with its acquisition of Textilease, and it is defending against claims concerning alleged environmental conditions with respect to a site once owned by a former subsidiary in Somerville, Massachusetts. The Company has accrued certain costs related to the sites described above as it has been determined that the costs are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The Company also has potential exposure related to an additional parcel of land (the Central Area) related to the Woburn, Massachusetts site discussed above. Currently, the consent order for the Woburn, Massachusetts site discussed above does not define or require any remediation work in the Central Area. The Company has not accrued for this contingency as the Company believes, at this time, the liability is not probable and the amount of such contingent liability can not be reasonably estimated.
The Company routinely reviews and evaluates sites that may require remediation and monitoring and determines its estimated costs based on various estimates and assumptions. These estimates are developed using its internal sources or by third party environmental engineers or other service providers. Internally developed estimates are based on:
| Management's judgment and experience in remediating and monitoring the Company's sites; |
| Information available from regulatory agencies as to costs of remediation and monitoring; |
| The number, financial resources and relative degree of responsibility of other potentially responsible parties (PRPs) who may be liable for remediation and monitoring of a specific site; and |
| The typical allocation of costs among PRPs. |
There is usually a range of reasonable estimates of the costs associated with each site. The Company uses the amount within the range that constitutes its best estimate. Where it believes that both the amount of a particular liability and the timing of the payments are reliably determinable, the Company adjusts the cost in current dollars using a rate of 3% for inflation until the time of expected payment and discount the cost to present value using risk-free rates of interest ranging from 4% to 5%.
For environmental liabilities that have been discounted, the Company includes interest accretion, based on the effective interest method, in operating costs on the consolidated statements of income. The changes to our environmental liabilities for the years ended August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004 are as follows (in thousands):
Year ended |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning balance | $ | 8,669 | $ | 5,377 | ||||
Obligations assumed in connection with Textilease acquisition | -- | 3,200 | ||||||
Costs incurred for which reserves have been provided | (760 | ) | (859 | ) | ||||
Insurance proceeds received | 161 | 263 | ||||||
Interest accretion | 465 | 429 | ||||||
Revisions in estimates | 791 | 259 | ||||||
Ending balance | $ | 9,326 | $ | 8,669 | ||||
Estimated insurance proceeds are primarily received from an annuity received as part of a legal settlement with an insurance company. Annual proceeds of approximately $0.3 million are deposited into an escrow account which funds remediation and monitoring costs for three sites related to former operations in Williamstown, Vermont. Annual proceeds received but not expended in the current year accumulate in this account and may be used in future years for costs related to this site through the year 2027. As of August 27, 2005 the balance in this escrow account, which is held in a trust and is not recorded on the Companys consolidated balance sheet, was approximately $1.7 million. Also included in estimated insurance proceeds are amounts the Company is entitled to receive pursuant to legal settlements as reimbursements from three insurance companies for estimated costs at the site in Uvalde, Texas.
Anticipated payments and insurance proceeds of currently identified environmental remediation liabilities as of August 27, 2005 for the next five years and thereafter as measured in current dollars are reflected below.
(In Thousands) |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Thereafter |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimated costs -- | |||||||||||||||||||||||
current dollars | $ | 1,864 | $ | 1,890 | $ | 1,793 | $ | 928 | $ | 773 | $ | 9,005 | $ | 16,253 | |||||||||
Estimated insurance | |||||||||||||||||||||||
proceeds | (247 | ) | (247 | ) | (247 | ) | (266 | ) | (247 | ) | (3,818 | ) | (5,072 | ) | |||||||||
Net anticipated costs | $ | 1,617 | $ | 1,643 | $ | 1,546 | $ | 662 | $ | 526 | $ | 5,187 | $ | 11,181 | |||||||||
Effect of Inflation | 2,971 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of Discounting | (4,826 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
August 27, 2005 | $ | 9,326 | |||||||||||||||||||||
The Companys nuclear garment decontamination facilities are licensed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), or, in certain cases, by the applicable state agency, and are subject to regulation by federal, state and local authorities. There can be no assurance that such regulation will not lead to material disruptions in the Companys garment decontamination business. From time to time, the Company is also subject to legal proceedings and claims arising from the conduct of its business operations, including litigation related to charges for certain ancillary services on invoices, personal injury claims, customer contract matters, employment claims and environmental matters as described above.
While it is impossible to ascertain the ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to contingent liabilities, including lawsuits and environmental contingencies, the Company believes that the aggregate amount of such liabilities, if any, in excess of amounts accrued or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operation of the Company. It is possible, however, that future financial position or results of operations for any particular future period could be materially affected by changes in the Companys assumptions or strategies related to these contingencies or changes out of the Companys control.
Other Contingent Liabilities
As security for certain agreements with the NRC and various state agencies related to the nuclear operations (see Note 14) and certain insurance programs, the Company had standby irrevocable bank commercial letters of credit of $24.6 million and $19.9 million outstanding as of August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004, respectively.
The Company adopted an incentive stock option plan (the Plan) in November 1996 and reserved 150,000 shares of Common Stock for issue under the Plan. In January of 2002, the Company increased the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan to 450,000. Options granted under the Plan, through August 27, 2005, are at a price equal to the fair market value of the Companys Common Stock on the date of grant. Options granted prior to fiscal 2003 are subject to a proportional four-year vesting schedule and expire eight years from the grant date. Options granted beginning in fiscal 2003 and thereafter are subject to a five-year cliff-vesting schedule under which options become vested or exercisable after five years from date of grant and expire ten years after the grant date. Certain options were granted during fiscal 2005 to outside directors of the Company, which were fully vested and expire ten years after the grant date.
The following table summarizes the Common Stock option activity for the fiscal years ended August 27, 2005, August 28, 2004, and August 30, 2003:
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outstanding, August 31, 2002 | 147,250 | $ | 14.30 | |||||
Granted | 56,200 | 20.10 | ||||||
Exercised | (14,250 | ) | 13.45 | |||||
Forfeited | (1,500 | ) | 14.65 | |||||
Outstanding, August 30, 2003 | 187,700 | $ | 16.10 | |||||
Granted | 61,800 | 24.45 | ||||||
Exercised | (26,175 | ) | 14.25 | |||||
Forfeited | (6,500 | ) | 16.24 | |||||
Outstanding, August 28, 2004 | 216,825 | $ | 18.70 | |||||
Granted | 67,600 | 27.98 | ||||||
Exercised | (32,325 | ) | 13.52 | |||||
Forfeited | (12,225 | ) | 22.22 | |||||
Outstanding, August 27, 2005 | 239,875 | $ | 21.83 | |||||
Exercisable, August 30, 2003 | 91,967 | $ | 14.05 | |||||
Exercisable, August 28, 2004 | 73,569 | $ | 14.41 | |||||
Exercisable, August 27, 2005 | 66,500 | $ | 15.89 | |||||
The following table summarizes information relating to currently outstanding and exercisable stock options as of August 27, 2005:
Outstanding Options |
Exercisable Options | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Range of Exercise Prices |
Number Outstanding |
Average Remaining Option Life |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Number Exercisable |
Weighted Average Exercise Price | ||||||||||||
$ 10.06 - 15.13 | 36,175 | 2.62 | $ | 12.51 | 36,175 | $ | 12.51 | ||||||||||
17.55 - 20.13 | 80,400 | 6.06 | 19.11 | 23,325 | 17.55 | ||||||||||||
24.35 - 27.98 | 123,300 | 8.72 | 26.34 | 7,000 | 27.83 | ||||||||||||
$ 10.06 - 27.98 | 239,875 | 6.91 | $ | 21.83 | 66,500 | $ | 15.89 | ||||||||||
The Company has two classes of common stock; Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote, is freely transferable, and is entitled to a cash dividend equal to 125% of any cash dividend paid on each share of Class B Common Stock. Each share of Class B Common Stock is entitled to ten votes and can be converted to Common Stock on a share-for-share basis. However, until converted to Common Stock, Class B Common shares are not freely transferable.
Effective July 1, 2004, companies incorporated in Massachusetts became subject to the Massachusetts Business Corporation Act, Chapter 156D. Chapter 156D provides that shares that are reacquired by a company become authorized but unissued shares. As a result, Chapter 156D eliminates the concept of treasury shares. Accordingly, at August 28, 2004, the Company redesignated 1.595 million shares of the Companys existing treasury shares, at an aggregate cost of $26.0 million, as authorized but unissued and allocated this amount to the Common Stocks par value and retained earnings.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows:
Foriegn Currency Translation |
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Instruments, net of tax |
Pension and Other |
Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance, August 31, 2002 | $ | (3,333 | ) | $ | (345 | ) | $ | -- | $ | (3,678 | ) | |||
Change during the period | 1,904 | 345 | -- | 2,249 | ||||||||||
Balance, August 30, 2003 | (1,429 | ) | -- | -- | (1,429 | ) | ||||||||
Change during the period | 1,001 | -- | (78 | ) | 923 | |||||||||
Balance, August 28, 2004 | (428 | ) | -- | (78 | ) | (506 | ) | |||||||
Change during the period | 2,915 | -- | (363 | ) | 2,552 | |||||||||
Balance, August 27, 2005 | $ | 2,487 | $ | -- | $ | (441 | ) | $ | 2,046 | |||||
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in annual financial statements and requires selected information of those segments to be presented in interim financial reports issued to shareholders. Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions on how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Companys chief operating decision maker, as defined under SFAS No. 131, is the Companys chief executive officer. The Company has six operating segments based on the information reviewed by its chief executive officer; US Rental and Cleaning, Canadian Rental and Cleaning, MFG, Specialty Garments, First Aid and Corporate. The US Rental and Cleaning and Canadian Rental and Cleaning operating segments have been combined to form the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment.
The US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment purchases, rents, cleans, delivers and sells, uniforms and protective clothing and non-garment items in the United States and Canada. The operations of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment are referred to by the Company as its industrial laundry operations and the locations related to this reporting segment are referred to as industrial laundries.
The MFG operating segment designs and manufactures uniforms and non-garment items solely for the purpose of providing these goods to the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment. The amounts reflected as revenues of MFG are generated when goods are shipped from the Companys manufacturing facilities to other Company locations. These revenues are recorded at a transfer price which is typically in excess of the actual manufacturing cost. The transfer price is determined by management and may not necessarily represent the fair value of the products manufactured. Products are carried in inventory and subsequently placed in service and amortized at this transfer price. On a consolidated basis, intercompany MFG revenues and MFG income are eliminated and the carrying value of inventories and rental merchandise in service is reduced to the manufacturing cost. Income before income taxes from MFG, net of the intercompany MFG elimination, was $21.6 million, $15.0 million, and $10.4 million for years ended August 27, 2005, August 28, 2004 and August 30, 2003, respectively. This income offsets the merchandise amortization costs incurred by the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment as the merchandise costs of this reporting segment are amortized and recognized based on inventories purchased from MFG at the transfer price which is above the Companys manufacturing cost.
The Corporate operating segment consists of costs associated with the Companys distribution center, sales and marketing, information systems, engineering, materials management, manufacturing planning, finance, budgeting, human resources, other general and administrative costs and interest expense. The revenues generated from the Corporate operating segment represent certain direct sales made by the Company directly from its distribution center. The products sold by this operating segment are the same products rented and sold by the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment. In the disclosure below, no assets or capital expenditures are presented for the Corporate operating segment as no assets are allocated to this operating segment in the information reviewed by the chief executive officer. However, depreciation and amortization expense related to certain assets are reflected in income from operations and income before income taxes for the Corporate operating segment. The assets that give rise to this depreciation and amortization are included in the total assets of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment as this is how they are tracked and reviewed by the Company.
The Specialty Garments operating segment purchases, rents, cleans, delivers and sells, specialty garments and non-garment items primarily for nuclear and clean room applications. The First Aid operating segment sells first aid cabinet services and other safety supplies. In fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002, no assets or capital expenditures are presented for the First Aid operating segment as no assets were allocated to this operating segment in the information reviewed by the chief executive officer as they were not material. However, depreciation and amortization expense related to certain assets are reflected in income from operations and income before income taxes for the First Aid operating segment. The assets that give rise to this depreciation and amortization in fiscal 2003 and 2002 are included in the total assets of the US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning reporting segment as this is how they were tracked and reviewed by the Company. After the Textilease acquisition in fiscal 2004, the Company began allocating assets to this operating segment as the total assets related to First Aid increased.
As of and for the year-ended August 27, 2005 |
US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning |
MFG |
Net Interco MFG Elim |
Specialty Garments |
First-Aid |
Corporate |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 668,313 | $ | 57,634 | $ | (57,634 | ) | $ | 61,697 | $ | 27,757 | $ | 6,075 | $ | 763,842 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | $ | 99,508 | $ | 21,390 | $ | 206 | $ | 6,907 | $ | 928 | $ | (52,927 | ) | $ | 76,012 | ||||||||
Interest (income) expense, net | $ | (1,362 | ) | $ | (12 | ) | $ | -- | $ | 82 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 8,140 | $ | 6,841 | ||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 100,870 | $ | 21,402 | $ | 206 | $ | 6,825 | $ | 935 | $ | (61,067 | ) | $ | 69,171 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | $ | 27,284 | $ | 1,425 | $ | -- | $ | 2,982 | $ | 1,307 | $ | 10,929 | $ | 43,927 | |||||||||
Capital expenditures, net | $ | 45,883 | $ | 447 | $ | -- | $ | 1,406 | $ | 5,519 | $ | -- | $ | 53,255 | |||||||||
Total assets | $ | 673,126 | $ | 6,612 | $ | -- | $ | 48,765 | $ | 19,802 | $ | -- | $ | 748,305 | |||||||||
As of and for the year-ended August 28, 2004 |
US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning |
MFG |
Net Interco MFG Elim |
Specialty Garments |
First-Aid |
Corporate |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 629,309 | $ | 53,694 | $ | (53,694 | ) | $ | 58,598 | $ | 26,668 | $ | 4,781 | $ | 719,356 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | $ | 88,729 | $ | 20,299 | $ | (5,277 | ) | $ | 7,113 | $ | 1,722 | $ | (48,582 | ) | $ | 64,004 | |||||||
Interest (income) expense, net | $ | (1,221 | ) | $ | 3 | $ | -- | $ | 171 | $ | 8 | $ | 10,445 | $ | 9,406 | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 89,950 | $ | 20,296 | $ | (5,277 | ) | $ | 6,942 | $ | 1,714 | $ | (59,027 | ) | $ | 54,598 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | $ | 26,577 | $ | 1,481 | $ | -- | $ | 3,385 | $ | 931 | $ | 12,515 | $ | 44,889 | |||||||||
Capital expenditures, net | $ | 24,931 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 3,356 | $ | 2,586 | $ | -- | $ | 30,873 | |||||||||
Total assets | $ | 637,997 | $ | 5,931 | $ | -- | $ | 44,468 | $ | 13,970 | $ | -- | $ | 702,366 | |||||||||
As of and for the year-ended August 30, 2003 |
US and Canadian Rental and Cleaning |
MFG |
Net Interco MFG Elim |
Specialty Garments |
First-Aid |
Corporate |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 524,701 | $ | 42,041 | $ | (42,041 | ) | $ | 57,749 | $ | 9,486 | $ | 5,000 | $ | 596,936 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | $ | 73,223 | $ | 13,837 | $ | (3,415 | ) | $ | 9,306 | $ | 45 | $ | (44,158 | ) | $ | 48,838 | |||||||
Interest (income) expense, net | $ | (1,042 | ) | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 195 | $ | 1 | $ | 2,112 | $ | 1,266 | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 74,265 | $ | 13,837 | $ | (3,415 | ) | $ | 9,111 | $ | 44 | $ | (46,270 | ) | $ | 47,572 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | $ | 23,329 | $ | 1,460 | $ | -- | $ | 2,757 | $ | 277 | $ | 11,836 | $ | 39,659 | |||||||||
Capital expenditures, net | $ | 30,607 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 7,312 | $ | -- | $ | -- | 37,919 | ||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 466,535 | $ | 6,280 | $ | -- | $ | 43,316 | $ | -- | $ | -- | $ | 516,131 | |||||||||
The Companys long-lived assets as of August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004 and revenues for the years ended August 27, 2005, August 28, 2004 and August 30, 2003 were attributed to the following countries (in thousands):
Long-lived assets as of: |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States | $ | 522,530 | $ | 505,888 | ||||
Europe, Canada, and Mexico (1) | 31,270 | 24,813 | ||||||
Total | $ | 553,800 | $ | 530,701 | ||||
Revenues for the year ended: |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 |
August 30, 2003 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States | $ | 709,153 | $ | 673,006 | $ | 559,240 | |||||
Europe, Canada, and Mexico (1) | 54,689 | 46,350 | 37,696 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 763,842 | $ | 719,356 | $ | 596,936 | |||||
Income before income taxes for the year ended: |
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 |
August 30, 2003 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States | $ | 62,365 | $ | 49,518 | $ | 40,171 | |||||
Europe, Canada, and Mexico (1) | 6,806 | 5,080 | 7,401 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 69,171 | $ | 54,598 | $ | 47,572 | |||||
(1) There is no country with greater than 10% of total long-lived assets, revenues, or income before income taxes.
Effective September 1, 2002, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 143, which generally applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset. Under the new accounting method, the Company now recognizes asset retirement obligations in the period in which they are incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset.
As of September 1, 2002, the Company recognized as a liability the present value of the estimated future costs to decommission its nuclear laundry facilities in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 143. The adoption of SFAS No. 143 resulted in a cumulative charge of $2.2 million, net of tax benefit of $1.4 million, related to the change in accounting principle, the recognition of a discounted asset retirement obligation of $5.3 million, and an increase of $2.4 million to the gross carrying value of the related long-lived assets ($0.9 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $1.5 million). The Company will depreciate, on a straight-line basis, the amount added to property and equipment and recognize accretion expense in connection with the discounted liability over the various remaining lives which range from approximately one to thirty years.
The estimated liability has been based on historical experience in decommissioning nuclear laundry facilities, estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, external vendor estimates as to the cost to decommission these assets in the future, and federal and state regulatory requirements. The estimated current costs have been adjusted for the estimated impact of inflation at 3% per year. The liability has been discounted using credit-adjusted risk-free rates that range from approximately 3% to 7% over one to thirty years. Revisions to the liability could occur due to changes in the Companys estimated useful lives of the underlying assets, estimated dates of decommissioning, changes in decommissioning costs, changes in federal or state regulatory guidance on the decommissioning of such facilities, or other changes in estimates. Changes due to revised estimates will be recognized by adjusting the carrying amount of the liability and the related long-lived asset if the assets are still in service, or charged to expense in the period if the assets are no longer in service.
A reconciliation of the Companys liability is as follows:
August 27, 2005 |
August 28, 2004 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beginning balance | $ | 7,446 | $ | 7,060 | ||||
Accretion expense | 511 | 431 | ||||||
Change in estimate of liability | 164 | 742 | ||||||
Asset retirement costs incurred | (1,203 | ) | (787 | ) | ||||
Ending balance | $ | 6,918 | $ | 7,446 | ||||
As of August 27, 2005, the $6.9 million asset retirement obligation is included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of UniFirst Corporation (the Company) and subsidiaries as of August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 27, 2005. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at item 15 (a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of UniFirst Corporation and Subsidiaries at August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 27, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 1(i) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for certain inventories from last-in-first-out (LIFO) method to the first-in-first-out (FIFO) method during the fourth quarter of 2005. The FIFO method has been retroactively applied to all periods presented.
As discussed in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, effective September 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (Statement) No. 143 Asset Retirement Obligations.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of UniFirst Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of August 27,2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated November 10, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 10, 2005
The following is a summary of the results of operations for each of the quarters within the years ended August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004. This summary should be read in conjunction with the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8.
The Companys fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in August. For financial reporting purposes, fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004 had 52 weeks. Each of the quarters presented below includes 13 weeks.
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For the year ended August 27, 2005 |
First Quarter |
Second Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Fourth Quarter | ||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 188,434 | $ | 190,684 | $ | 195,957 | $ | 188,767 | ||||||
Income before income taxes | 21,538 | 16,232 | 19,037 | 12,364 | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 8,184 | 6,169 | 7,235 | 4,235 | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 13,354 | $ | 10,063 | $ | 11,802 | $ | 8,129 | ||||||
Net income per Common share -- basic | $ | 0.78 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||
Net income per Class B Common share -- basic | $ | 0.62 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.55 | $ | 0.38 | ||||||
Net income per Common share -- diluted | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.61 | $ | 0.42 | ||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding -- basic | ||||||||||||||
Common Stock | 9,281 | 9,456 | 9,467 | 9,509 | ||||||||||
Class B Common Stock | 9,926 | 9,759 | 9,758 | 9,723 | ||||||||||
19,207 | 19,215 | 19,225 | 19,232 | |||||||||||
Weighted average number of Common Stock shares | ||||||||||||||
outstanding -- diluted | 19,277 | 19,315 | 19,336 | 19,345 | ||||||||||
For the year ended August 28, 2004 |
First Quarter |
Second Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Fourth Quarter | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues | $ | 180,898 | $ | 177,407 | $ | 182,985 | $ | 178,066 | ||||||
Income before income taxes | 15,485 | 10,718 | 16,167 | 12,228 | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 5,962 | 4,126 | 6,224 | 4,708 | ||||||||||
Net income | $ | 9,523 | $ | 6,592 | $ | 9,943 | $ | 7,520 | ||||||
Net income per Common share -- basic | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.58 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||
Net income per Class B Common share -- basic | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.31 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.35 | ||||||
Net income per Common share -- diluted | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.52 | $ | 0.39 | ||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding -- basic | ||||||||||||||
Common Stock | 9,009 | 9,022 | 9,127 | 9,253 | ||||||||||
Class B Common Stock | 10,175 | 10,168 | 10,073 | 9,950 | ||||||||||
19,184 | 19,190 | 19,200 | 19,203 | |||||||||||
Weighted average number of Common Stock shares | ||||||||||||||
outstanding -- diluted | 19,249 | 19,253 | 19,271 | 19,277 | ||||||||||
None.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information, which is required to be timely disclosed, is accumulated and communicated to Management in a timely fashion. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of UniFirsts disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act))(Disclosure Controls) was performed as of the end of the period covered by this report. This evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys Management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these Disclosure Controls are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Companys Management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SECs rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Management of UniFirst Corporation (UniFirst) is responsible for the preparation, integrity and objectivity of UniFirsts consolidated financial statements and other financial information contained in its Annual Report to Shareholders. Those consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In preparing those consolidated financial statements, Management was required to make certain estimates and judgments, which are based upon currently available information and Managements view of current conditions and circumstances.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which consists solely of independent directors, oversees our process of reporting financial information and the audit of our consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee stays informed of the financial condition of UniFirst and regularly reviews Managements financial policies and procedures, the independence of our independent auditors, our internal control and the objectivity of our financial reporting. Our independent registered public accounting firm has free access to the Audit Committee and meet with the Audit Committee periodically, both with and without Management present.
We have retained Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, to audit our consolidated financial statements found in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 27, 2005. We have made available to Ernst & Young LLP all of our financial records and related data in connection with their audit of our consolidated financial statements.
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission the required certifications related to our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended August 27, 2005. These certifications are attached as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 27, 2005. Additionally, we have also provided to the New York Stock Exchange the required annual certification of our Chief Executive Officer regarding our compliance with the New York Stock Exchanges corporate governance listing standards.
Management has responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of August 27, 2005. In making its assessment, Management has utilized the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework . Management concluded that based on its assessment, UniFirsts internal control over financial reporting was effective as of August 27, 2005. Managements assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of August 27, 2005 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report dated November 10, 2005, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 27, 2005.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting presented in Item 9A, that UniFirst Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 27, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). UniFirst Corporations management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that UniFirst Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 27, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, UniFirst Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 27, 2005, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of UniFirst Corporation and subsidiaries as of August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 27, 2005 of UniFirst Corporation and our report dated November 10, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 10, 2005
On October 27, 2005, the Company granted options under the Stock Incentive Plan to purchase (i) 2,100 shares of its Common Stock to Ronald D. Croatti, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, (ii) 1,600 shares of its Common Stock to Cynthia Croatti, Executive Vice President and Treasurer, (iii) 1,600 shares of its Common Stock to John B. Bartlett, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, (iv) 1,400 shares of its Common Stock to Dennis G. Assad, Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing, (v) 1,400 shares of its Common Stock to Bruce P. Boynton, Senior Vice President, Operations, (vi) 1,400 shares of its Common Stock to David A. DiFillippo, Senior Vice President, Operations. The exercise price of each option was $34.83, the closing price on October 27, 2005. The options vest on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant or earlier as provided in the applicable stock option agreement or the Stock Incentive Plan and expire ten years from the date of grant. A copy of the form of employee stock option agreement under the Stock Incentive Plan is attached to the August 28, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibit 10-F and is incorporated herein by reference.
The Board of Directors, based on a recommendation from the Compensation Committee, has established the compensation for calendar 2006 for each non-employee Director as follows: an annual fee of $24,000; an annual fee for chairing a Committee of $4,000; a $2,500 fee for each Board meeting attended; a $500 fee for each Committee meeting attended if held on the same day as a Board meeting; a $2,000 daily fee for one or more Committee meetings attended on a single day if not held on the same day as a Board meeting; a $1,000 fee for participating in a telephonic Board meeting; a $500 fee for participating in a telephonic Committee meeting; and an option to purchase 1,000 shares of Common Stock, to be issued on the third business day following the Companys 2006 annual meeting of shareholders
Incorporated by reference to the information provided under the caption Election of Directors in the Companys Proxy Statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Incorporated by reference to the information provided under the caption Summary Compensation Table, Option Grants with Respect to Fiscal Year 2005, Option Exercises and Year-End Holdings, Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and Stock Performance Graph in the Companys Proxy Statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Incorporated by reference to the information provided under the captions Election of Directors, and Security Ownership of Management and Principal Shareholders, in the Companys Proxy Statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Equity Compensation Plan Information in Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Incorporated by reference to the information provided under the caption Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in the Companys Proxy Statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Incorporated by reference to the information provided under the caption Independent Auditors in the Companys Proxy Statement for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
(a) The financial statements listed below are filed as part of this report:
1. and 2. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
The financial statements listed below are included under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Consolidated statements of income for each of the three years in the period ended August 27, 2005
Consolidated balance sheets as of August 27, 2005 and August 28, 2004
Consolidated statements of shareholders equity for each of the three years in the period ended August 27, 2005
Consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 27, 2005
Notes to consolidated financial statements
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following additional schedule is filed herewith:
Schedule II Valuation and qualifying accounts and reserves for each of the three years in the period ended August 27, 2005
Description |
Balance, Beginning of Period |
Charged to Costs and Expenses |
Charges for Which Reserves Were Created or Deductions |
Balance, End of Period | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
||||||||||||||
For the year ended August 27, 2005 | $ | 2,616 | $ | 3,097 | $ | (2,534 | ) | $ | 3,179 | |||||
For the year ended August 28, 2004 | $ | 2,611 | $ | 3,132 | $ | (3,127 | ) | $ | 2,616 | |||||
For the year ended August 30, 2003 | $ | 2,687 | $ | 3,066 | $ | (3,142 | ) | $ | 2,611 | |||||
Reserve for Obsolete Inventory | ||||||||||||||
For the year ended August 27, 2005 | $ | 1,126 | $ | 455 | $ | (728 | ) | $ | 853 | |||||
For the year ended August 28, 2004 | $ | 1,082 | $ | 913 | $ | (869 | ) | $ | 1,126 | |||||
For the year ended August 30, 2003 | $ | 1,100 | $ | 557 | $ | (575 | ) | $ | 1,082 | |||||
Separate financial statements of the Company have been omitted because the Company is primarily an operating company and all subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements are totally held.
All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the financial statements or the notes thereto.
3. EXHIBITS. The list of exhibits filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K are set forth at (c) below.
(c) Exhibits
2.1 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 17, 2003 by and among the Company and the stockholders of Textilease Corporation signatory thereto incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 17, 2003.
3-A Restated Articles of Organization incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-A to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 2-83051) and the Articles of Amendment dated January 12, 1988, a copy of which was filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 27, 1988 and the Articles of Amendment dated January 21, 1993, a copy of which was filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 27, 1993.
3-B By-laws incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-B to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1991.
10-A UniFirst Corporation Profit Sharing Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-60781) and the Amendment dated June 27, 1995, a copy of which was filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1996.
10-D UniFirst Corporation 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-D to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002).
10-E Form of UniFirst Corporation stock option award to non-employee directors, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-E to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004).
10-F Form of UniFirst Corporation stock option award to executive officers, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-F to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004).
14.1 UniFirst Corporation Statement of Corporate Policy and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Companys Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on December 10, 2003.
18.1 Preferability Letter from Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
21 List of Subsidiaries, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004).
* 23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
* 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Ronald D. Croatti
* 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of John B. Bartlett
** 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
** 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
* Filed herewith
** Furnished herewith
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
UniFirst Corporation By: /s/ Ronald D. Croatti Ronald D. Croatti President and Chief Executive Officer |
November 10, 2005
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
NAME |
TITLE |
DATE |
---|---|---|
/s/ Ronald D. Croatti Ronald D. Croatti /s/ John B. Bartlett John B. Bartlett /s/ Cynthia Croatti Cynthia Croatti /s/ Donald J. Evans Donald J. Evans /s/ Albert Cohen Albert Cohen /s/ Phillip L. Cohen Phillip L. Cohen /s/ Anthony F. DiFillippo Anthony F. DiFillippo /s/ Lawrence Pugh Lawrence Pugh /s/ Robert F. Collings Robert F. Collings |
Principal Executive Officer and Director Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer Director Director Director Director Director Director Director |
November 10, 2005 November 10, 2005 November 10, 2005 November 10, 2005 November 10, 2005 November 10, 2005 November 10, 2005 November 10, 2005 November 10, 2005 |
2.1 Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of July 17, 2003 by and among the Company and the stockholders of Textilease Corporation signatory thereto incorporated by reference to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 17, 2003.
3-A Restated Articles of Organization incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-A to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 2-83051) and the Articles of Amendment dated January 12, 1988, a copy of which was filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 27, 1988 and the Articles of Amendment dated January 21, 1993, a copy of which was filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended February 27, 1993.
3-B By-laws incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3-B to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1991.
10-A UniFirst Corporation Profit Sharing Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-60781) and the Amendment dated June 27, 1995, a copy of which was filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 1996.
10-D UniFirst Corporation 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-D to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002).
10-E Form of UniFirst Corporation stock option award to non-employee directors, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-E to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004).
10-F Form of UniFirst Corporation stock option award to executive officers, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10-F to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004).
14.1 UniFirst Corporation Statement of Corporate Policy and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Companys Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on December 10, 2003.
18.1 Preferability Letter from Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
21 List of Subsidiaries, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 28, 2004).
* 23.1 Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
* 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of Ronald D. Croatti
* 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) certification of John B. Bartlett
** 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
** 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002
* Filed herewith
** Furnished herewith
Mr. John B. Bartlett
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
UniFirst Corporation
68 Jonspin Road
Wilmington, MA 01887
Dear Sir:
Note 1(i) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of UniFirst Corporation included in its Form 10-K for the year ended August 27, 2005 describes a change in the method of accounting for inventories from the last-in first-out (LIFO) to the first-in first-out (FIFO) method. There are no authoritative criteria for determining a preferable inventory accounting method based on particular circumstances, however, we conclude that such change in the method of accounting is to an acceptable alternative method which, based on your business judgment to make this change and for the stated reasons, is preferable in your circumstances.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 10, 2005
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-60781, 333-96097, and 333-82682) of UniFirst Corporation of our report dated November 10, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of UniFirst Corporation, and our report dated November 10, 2005, with respect to UniFirst Corporation managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of UniFirst Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended August 27, 2005.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP Boston, Massachusetts November 10, 2005 |
I, Ronald D. Croatti, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005 of UniFirst Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant, and have: |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting and; |
5. | The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 10, 2005 | By: /s/ Ronald D. Croatti Ronald D. Croatti, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
I, John B. Bartlett, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 27, 2005 of UniFirst Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant, and have: |
(a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
(b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ; |
(c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
(d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting and; |
5. | The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
(b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: November 10, 2005 | By: /s/ John B. Bartlett John B. Bartlett, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
I, Ronald D. Croatti, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of UniFirst Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report. |
Date: November 10, 2005 | By: /s/ Ronald D. Croatti Ronald D. Croatti, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
I, John B. Bartlett , certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of UniFirst Corporation; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report. |
Date: November 10, 2005 | By: /s/ John B. Bartlett John B. Bartlett, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |